[net.consumers] YAS

kjchapman@wateng.UUCP (Kevin J. Chapman) (12/14/84)

>

     A company known as "Federal Testing Authority" has been in the news
  recently in the southern Ontario region.  In the packages they sent to
  home-owners they purported to be a marketing research outfit of some
  sort, and they included a survey card on TV watching habits.  The survey
  was to be filled in by the addressee or a member of the addressee's family
  only. This seemed odd since there was no address on the envelope, which
  came with advertising flyers (and not in the mail).  The distribution
  method they chose seemed to conflict with their assertion that the addressee
  had been "COMPUTER SELECTED" to participate.
     The survey consisted of about 12 questions such as "Do you watch sports 
  on TV?", "How much TV do you watch a week?", and "Do you own a home comp-
  uter(PC) or VCR?".  The questions seemed rather vague & pointless, and I 
  couldn't see how the responses would be of use to anyone, especially
  since there were no requests for demographic information (advertisers do
  like to know the sex/age/income of their target audience, don't they?).
      Now here's the best part of the scheme: respondents were to receive
  gifts for participating, including microwave ovens, free film, computers
  and cash.  "Shades of Gold Coast Distributors", thought I, "and yet they show
  cash values for each of these prizes, none of which is lower than several
  hundred dollars".  All one had to do is send in $16.80 for postage & handling.
  I didn't look at all of the 20 or so prizes listed, and I missed the  equiv-
  alent of Gold Coast's satellite dish - a membership in a "film club" which
  offered free film for processing one's film with them.  This was supposed to 
  be worth $720 in a lifetime.  (I should point out here that your wary 
  correspondent was in no way fooled by the apparent generosity of FTA, despite
  having overlooked the "free film" prize.  I can assure you that I would have
  examined the list very carefully had I decided to participate.  I guess the
  thousands who sent in their money were not as careful.)
      The owner of FTA was no dummy, of course.  Not only was he charging
  seventeen bucks for a service many stores offer for free by cleverly 
  (or perhaps not so cleverly) disguising it, but he was actually using the
  results of the survey!  The names & addresses of those answering "No" to
  the question on PCs & VCRs were sold to, you guessed it, a company which
  sold PCs and VCRs.
      Although some were fooled by the scheme, many more were suspicious.
  The local Better Business Bureau received something like 1500 calls in a 
  week about this - quite a bit for a city of about eighty thousand households.
      If I recall correctly, the owner of the company has returned to his
  native Florida, and letters to the outfit will be intercepted & returned
  to the gullible/naive senders.

       As always - Caveat Emptor


   
                          Kevin Chapman
                          Computer Communications Networks Group
                          Waterversity of Uniloo
                          'Loo, Ont., Canada

kfl@hoxna.UUCP (Kenton Lee) (12/16/84)

xxx
You're lucky the results of the "who owns a VCR or PC?" survey
wasn't sold to a burglary ring.