[net.consumers] JVC Videomovie Review

gjw@clyde.UUCP (Gregory J. Wroclawski) (04/02/85)

	I had recently purchased JVC Videomovie camcorder after evaluating
all the current camcorders on the market. My decision to buy the JVC was 
arrived at after realizing that the JVC was the most elegant solution to the
camera/recorder packaging problem on the market. It had all the necessary 
features needed in the smallest and lightest package, yet its compact cassets 
could be played back in a standard VHS deck(w/adapter). 
	On several occasions I had borrowed a friends Betamovie BMC-110.
The JVC weighs well under 5 pounds with battery and cassette. The Betamovie
weighs nearly 7 pounds similarly equipped and its considerably larger size
made it quite cumbersome to lug around all day. At that point I also realized
that the nearly one hour/charge the Betamovie gave me was more that I need
or would ever use. A weekend long school reunion trip I filmed required less
than 45 minutes of tape. Upon reviewing the tape I realized I had made many
scenes too long. Another glaring deficiency of the Betamovie was the lack of
any rewind, fast forward or reviewing capability. The Beta movie also lacked
an electronic viewfinder which together with the lack of rewind precluded
reviewing any scene one had filmed to see how it turned out. The Betamovie 
also lacks a tape counter but one can see the remaining tape in a window
on the body. 
	I also seriously considered a Kodavision 2400. This camcorder uses the
new 8 mm format and cassettes of upto 90 minutes of recording time are avail-
able although the battery lasts less than an hour. I was somewhat biased against
the 8mm format since it is third  uncompatible format added to the Beta/VHS
fray.  This camcorder has all the all the same features as the JVC: 4 heads, 3x 
forward and reverse review,fast forward and rewind, electronic viewfinder,
digital tape counter with memory. In addition the Kodavision 2400 has auto-
focusing.  Since I had experience using the Betamovie without auto-focusing I 
realized that it was not an essential feature. The main deficiency of the Kodak
camcorder was the fact that playback required the camera to be placed large
playback cradle. Since the idea of a camcorder is portability this was a
serious drawback. Playback with the JVC requires a simple cord connecting
the camcorder to the TV. Also the Kodak weighs 5 and a half pounds with
a battery and cassette and is somewhat larger than the JVC. 
	The built in playback capability of the JVC allows one to transfer
all the 20 minute cassette contents to a full size cassette with a negligible
loss of quality. At the same time one can do some crude editing (inserting
titles). The VHS-C cassettes are about the same size as a package of 
cigarettes. The standard battery pack gives one 30 minutes of recording time.
I also purchased the optional 45 minute pack. This larger battery adds only
an eigth of an inch to the end of the camcorder and a couple of ounces in 
weight. This larger battery allows enough time to fully fill two VHS-C 
cassettes with some spare time for setup and review. 
	On a recent ski trip my wife and I took the the 45 minute battery
along with two cassettes (one in the camera, one in my pocket). This
provided more than enough taping time for a whole day of skiing. 
	If one buys the optional 45 minute battery. the AC adapter is not
necessary. The recharge time of the standard 30min battery is ~40 min and
the recharge time of the 45 min battery is about one hour. This allows almost
continuous operation of the camera at home.
	Another good accessory to get is the shoulder prop. The camera body
is too small to rest on ones shoulder and align the viewfinder with the eye.
The shoulder prop adds practically no weight and when folded adds only a quarter
of an inch to the bottom of the camera body.