[net.bio] Dogs

werner@aecom.UUCP (Craig Werner) (04/21/85)

>                      .  The claim is made that dogs do not suffer any ill
> effects from eating lots of cholesterol.  Can anyone confirm, refute, or
> explain this phenomenon?

	Actually there is still some dispute whether eating lots of cholesterol
causes measurably ill effects in people.
	Although the following are undisputed:

	1. The lower one's Serum cholesterol the lower one's chance of having a
heart attack.
	2. Diet low in Cholesterol lowers serum cholesterol - but not a lot.

	The trouble is that the slight lowering in serum cholesterol due to
diet doesn`t cause a significant drop in heart disease. The body makes 80-90%
of its own cholesterol, and more or less, the more you eat, the less you make,
and vice-versa.  
	The more or less is the caveat. The system isn't 100% efficient, which
is why diet has that small effect in the first place.
	Certain drugs (like Cholestyramine, which significantly lower
Cholesterol - 40-50% drop), do have significant effect but these act on total
body cholesterol.
	
	Dogs, therefore, if the source is to be believed (and I have no reason
to doubt it) might have a better regulatory system than man, and adjust their
own production more keenly, so diet would have even less effect.
-- 
				Craig Werner
				!philabs!aecom!werner
		What do you expect?  Watermelons are out of season!