[net.bio] Freeman Dyson's "TW,TF,&TD" -- III. Biological Engineering

michaelm@3comvax.UUCP (05/16/86)

THE WORLD, THE FLESH, AND THE DEVIL

Freeman J. Dyson
Institute for Advanced Study
Princeton, New Jersey

III.  Biological Engineering

I would expect the earliest and least controversial triumphs of
biological engineering to be extensions of the art of industrial
fermentation.  When we are able to produce microorganisms equipped
with enzyme systems tailored to our own design, we can use such
organisms to perform chemical operations with far greater delicacy
and economy than present industrial practices allow.  For example,
oil refineries would contain a variety of bugs designed to metabolize
crude petroleum into the precise hydrocarbon stereo-isomers which are
needed for various purposes.  One tank would contain the n-octane
bug, another the benzene bug, and so on.  All the bugs would contain
enzymes metabolizing sulphur into elemental form, so that pollution
of the atmosphere by sulphurous gases would be completely controlled.  
The management and operation of such fermentation tanks on a vast
scale would not be easy, but the economic and social rewards are so
great that I am confident we shall learn how to do it.  After we have
mastered the biological oil refinery, more important applications of
the same principles will follow.  We shall have factories producing
specific foodstuffs biologically from cheap raw materials, and
sewage-treatment plants converting our wastes efficiently into
usable solids and pure water.  To perform these operations we shall
need an armamentarium of many species of microorganisms trained to
ingest and excrete the appropriate chemicals.  And we shall design
into the metabolism of these organisms the essential property of
self-liquidation, so that when deprived of food they disappear by
cannibalizing one another.  They will not, like the bacteria that
feed on our sewage in today's technology, leave their rotting
carcasses behind to make a sludge only slightly less noxious
than the mess they have eaten.  

If these expectations are fulfilled, the advent of biological
technology will help enormously in the establishment of patterns of
industrial development with which human beings can live in health and
comfort.  Oil refineries need not stink.  Rivers need not be sewers.  
However, there are many environmental problems which the use of
artificial organisms in enclosed tanks will not touch.  For example,
the fouling of the environment by mining and by abandoned automobiles
will not be reduced by building cleaner factories.  The second step in
biological engineering, after the enclosed biological factory, is to
let artificial organisms loose into the environment.  This is
admittedly a more dangerous and problematical step than the first.  
The second step should be taken only when we have a deep understanding
of its ecological consequences.  Nevertheless the advantages which
artificial organisms offer in the environmental domain are so great
that we are unlikely to forego their use forever.  

The two great functions which artificial organisms promise to perform
for us when let loose upon the earth are mining and scavenging.  The
beauty of a natural landscape undisturbed by man is largely due to the
fact that the natural organisms in a balanced ecology are excellent
miners and scavengers.  Mining is mostly done by plants and
microorganisms extracting minterals from water, air, and soil.  For
example, it has been recently discovered that organisms in the ground
mine ammonia and carbon monoxide from air with high efficiency.  To the
scavengers we owe the fact that a natural forest is not piled as high
with dead birds as one of our junk yards with dead cars.  Many of the
worst offenses of humanbeings against natural beauty are due to our
incompetence in mining and scavenging.  Natural organisms know how to
mine and scavenge effectively in a natural environment.  In a man-made
environment, neither they nor we know how to do it.  But there is no
reason why we should not be able to design artificial organisms that
are adaptable enough to collect our raw materials and dispose of our
refuse in an environment that is a careful mixture of natural and
artificial.  

A simple example of a problem that an articial organism could solve is
the eutrophication of lakes.  At present many lakes are being ruined
by excessive growth of algae feeding on high levels of nitrogen or
phosphorus in the water.  The damage could be stopped by an organism
that would convert nitrogen to molecular form or phosphorus to an
insoluble solid.  Alternatively and preferably, an organism could
be designed to divert the nitrogen and phosphorus into a food chain
culminating in some species of palatable fish.  To control and harvest
the mineral resources of the lake in this way will in the long run be
more feasible than to maintain artificially a state of "natural"
barrenness.  

The articial mining organisms would not operate in the style of human
miners.  Many of them would be designed to mine the ocean.  For
example, oysters might extract gold from seawater and secrete golden
pearls.  A less poetic but more practical possibility is the artificial
coral that build a reef rich in copper or magnesium.  Other mining
organisms would burrow like earthworms into mud and clay, concentrating
in their bodies the ores of aluminum or tin or iron, and excreting the
ores in some manner convenient for human harvesting.  Almost every raw
material necessary for our existence can be mined from ocean, air or
clay, without digging deep into the earth.  Where conventional mining
is necessary, artificial organisms can still be useful for digesting
and purifying the ore.  

Not much imagination is needed to foresee the effectiveness of
artificial organisms as scavengers.  A suitable microorganism could
convert the dangerous organic mercury in our rivers and lakes to a
harmless insoluble solid.  We could make good use of an organism
with a consuming appetite for polyvinyl chloride and similar plastic
materials which now litter beaches all over the earth.  Conceivably
we may produce an animal specifically designed for chewing up dead
automobiles.  But one may hope that the automobile in its present
form will become extinct before it needs to be incorporated into an
artificial foodchain.  A more serious and permanent role for scavenging
organisms is the removal of trace quantities of radioactivity from the
environment.  The three most hazardous radioactive elements produced
in fission reactors are strontium, cesium, and plutonium.  These
elements have long half-lives and will inevitably be released in small
quantities so long as mankind uses nuclear fission as an energy source.  
The long-term hazard of nuclear energy would be notably reduced if we
had organisms designed to gobble up these three elements from water or
soil and convert them into indigestible form.  Fortunately, none of
these three elements is essential to our body chemistry, and it
therefore does us no harm if they are made indigestible.