grw@fortune.UUCP (Glenn Wichman) (05/11/84)
[What are you reading ME for?] Another common mistake on the net and in the world is the use of the word "less" where the word "fewer" is appropriate. The most recent use of it that I saw was: "There would be less KGB agents..." Anything that comes in units (KGB agents, Donny Osmond lookalikes, Wombats, etc.) should be modified with the word "fewer"; anything that comes in a mass (like Rice Pudding, Time, Thyme, and Wombat purree) should be modified with the word "less". "More" is the correct opposite for both words, whence the confusion. No cute signoff, -Glenn
nather@utastro.UUCP (Ed Nather) (05/14/84)
[] No cute signoff, -Glenn Will somebody please mail this poor, underprivileged fellow a cute signoff? It distresses me to see such poverty :-). -- Ed Nather ihnp4!{ut-sally,kpno}!utastro!nather Astronomy Dept., U. of Texas, Austin
ron@brl-vgr.ARPA (Ron Natalie <ron>) (05/15/84)
I thought the "No cute signoff" signoff was a contradiction. -Ron
rpw3@fortune.UUCP (05/17/84)
#R:fortune:-328100:fortune:6700037:000:240 fortune!rpw3 May 16 19:47:00 1984 Are we back to oxymorons so soon? "No cute signoff", indeed! Rob Warnock UUCP: {ihnp4,ucbvax!amd70,hpda,harpo,sri-unix,allegra}!fortune!rpw3 DDD: (415)595-8444 USPS: Fortune Systems Corp, 101 Twin Dolphin Drive, Redwood City, CA 94065
wls@astrovax.UUCP (William L. Sebok) (05/17/84)
>> No cute signoff, >> -Glenn >Will somebody please mail this poor, underprivileged fellow a cute signoff? >It distresses me to see such poverty :-). > Ed Nather > ihnp4!{ut-sally,kpno}!utastro!nather > Astronomy Dept., U. of Texas, Austin There is nothing better than a cute signoff saying "No cute signoff". (-: :-) -- Bill Sebok Princeton University, Astrophysics {allegra,akgua,burl,cbosgd,decvax,ihnp4,kpno,princeton,vax135}!astrovax!wls
kaufman@uiucdcs.UUCP (05/18/84)
#R:fortune:-328100:uiucdcs:10600163:000:143 uiucdcs!kaufman May 18 12:29:00 1984 [no cute bug eater] I'm afraid it's time for the Crucify the Cute Signoff of the Month Contest. Anonymous and proud of it.
jlw@ariel.UUCP (J.WOOD) (05/19/84)
I don't know whether this is a true grammatical error or not, but the title of this article grates on my ear. I have always used the rule that the word fewer should be used in cases like this. I always use fewer when I'm talking or writing about countable things. For example, "Tom has fewer dollars in his wallet than Bill." On the other hand, I would use the word less for those occasions when I'm discussing uncountable amounts, as in, "Tom has less money than Bill." Joseph L. Wood, III AT&T Information Systems Laboratories, Holmdel (201) 834-3759 ariel!jlw PS I also removed the gratuitous ' - (nf)'. JLW