[net.misc] amateurs in Olympics

crm@rti.UUCP (05/17/84)

The original olympics weren't amateur at all -- the winners got a BIG chunk
of money, not to mention that they were glorified in their home town,
ensure
damn -- ensuring that they got lots of juicy fringes...

In fact, the requirement that the athletes be amateur was started by the
British/English guy who re-started the Olympics.  He wanted to make sure
that only the upper-class could compete, unsullied by contact with the
working classes who had to work for a living.

citrin@ucbvax.UUCP (05/19/84)

One thing I want to point out concerning crn@rti's article on
amateurism: the Olympics were not revived by an Englishman, but by a
Frenchman, Baron de Coubertin.  Apparently he was an Anglophile who
believed that amateur sports, particularly as practiced in British
public schools, were the reason for the vitality of British
culture and he wished to instill those virtues in French youth.  
A revived Olympics were the vehicle he decided upon.

What were the original reasons for amateur sport?  One, of course,
was to keep sport the province of the upper class.  Supposedly another 
was a belief that professional athletes were more likely to be in the pay
of bookies.  

Wayne Citrin
(ucbvax!citrin)

crm@rti.UUCP (05/22/84)

OK, he was a frenchman.  The guy I'm talking about was english...
I got this story out of some magazine I read, like TV guide; that'll
teach me.

Charlie Martin