[net.tv.drwho] Inconsistency in "The Time Meddler"

kyrimis@tilt.FUN (Kriton Kyrimis) (03/02/86)

At some point in "The Time Meddler", Viki goes through the Monk's
diary, and one of the things she reads is the following:

"Put 200 pounds in a London bank  in  1968,  leaped  forward  200
years and collected a fortune in compound interest."

Very ingenious. However, didn't the Daleks invade earth in  2150?
Two  hundred years after 1968 would make it 2168, which should be
*after* the invasion.  Apart from the fact that human society was
completely  disorganised before the Daleks' invasion, wasn't Lon-
don supposed to have been completely destroyed by the Daleks? (In
fact,  I  believe that in an earlier episode someone from the fu-
ture -was it Viki?- was surprised to hear that  Ian  and  Barbara
were  from  London, because London _did_not_exist_in_his/her_time
!!!)

So, HOW ON EARTH DID THE MONK GET THAT "FORTUNE"?

Incidentally, how can one withdraw money  from  an  account  that
hasn't  been touched for 200 years? If it can be done, I'd better
put more effort into building my time machine :-)
-- 

	Kriton	(princeton!tilt!kyrimis)
------
"I'm *depending* on luck, lieutenant; It's almost the  only  tool
 that will work, now!"
------

ins_bjab@jhunix.UUCP (Jessica A Browner) (03/04/86)

> At some point in "The Time Meddler", Viki goes through the Monk's
> diary, and one of the things she reads is the following:
> 
> "Put 200 pounds in a London bank  in  1968,  leaped  forward  200
> years and collected a fortune in compound interest."
> 
> Very ingenious. However, didn't the Daleks invade earth in  2150?
> Two  hundred years after 1968 would make it 2168, which should be
> *after* the invasion.  Apart from the fact that human society was
> completely  disorganised before the Daleks' invasion, wasn't Lon-
> don supposed to have been completely destroyed by the Daleks? (In
> fact,  I  believe that in an earlier episode someone from the fu-
> ture -was it Viki?- was surprised to hear that  Ian  and  Barbara
> were  from  London, because London _did_not_exist_in_his/her_time
> !!!)
> 
> So, HOW ON EARTH DID THE MONK GET THAT "FORTUNE"?

  The Doctor has always made a point of mentioning that there 
  exists always more than only one possible course of events leading
  to more than one possible future.  (Case in point:  "Pyramids of
  Mars" when the Doctor and Sarah jump forward in time to see what the
  future would be like if Sutekh was not stopped).  For a being with
  time travel capabilities (like the Monk), it is extremely easy to
  access these alternate futures.  That is how he was able to jump
  forward into a future where London had NOT been destroyed and
  collect his fortune.

  Naturally, this type of thing can become quite a problem for the
  scriptwriters, who find it much easier to ignore it and write a
  story in spite of this little incontinuity.

  Take your pick of explanations.

                                                  - Jessica    :-)