[net.sport.hoops] ethics?

fredrickson@celica.DEC (03/18/86)

>Newsgroups: net.sport.hoops
>Path: decwrl!decvax!bellcore!ulysses!burl!gc49!smithrd
>Subject: Re: NCAA contest picks
>Posted: 14 Mar 86 20:06:00 GMT
>Organization: AT&T Technologies, Guilford Center, NC
>Keywords: ethics
>Summary: me-thinks something is fishy about this one
> 
>In article <1654@decwrl.DEC.COM> fredrickson@celica.DEC writes:
><142 lines of text deleted>
>>The preceding picks were submitted Thursday morning, March 13.
>>
>>Mark Fredrickson
> 
> 
>However, from the article, we also note:
>	>Date: 13 Mar 86 17:31:20 GMT
>	>Date-Received: 14 Mar 86 09:28:02 GMT
>	>Sender: daemon@decwrl.DEC.COM
> 
>I can only assume:
>	(1) you're pulling our leg
>	(2) you're desparate
>	(3) "submitted" should have been followed by "to the keypunch
>		group"
>or
>	(4) you're using some home(DEC)-brewed interface to posting
>		news (as evidenced by the daemon sender and your
>		machine name being different from the posting machine)
> 
>I'd guess #4  (I believe in the goodness of mankind), but you can
>understand my reluctance to take such a posting seriously.
> 
>But then again, I could be wrong (remember the NIT....)
>-- 
>				Randy D. Smith	(919) 279-5312
>			AT&T Technologies, Guilford Center, NC
>			....!{ihnp4,burl}!{gc49,gc3ba}!smithrd

I have no desire (or motive) to deceive you folks. I know nothing of the 
process a posting follows before it reaches its final destination. I sat here
at my desk last Thursday morning and made my picks and whisked them away to
the address I always use. I put the note on the bottom because I had no idea
how long it would take for it to be posted and I knew the games were starting 
that day.

I guess following your choice #3 would have been advisable ("submitted to the 
keypunch group") if I knew enough to do that.

As for your #4, I haven't got the foggiest notion of what that even means.

I realize the fact that I was 14-2 (I missed Depaul and Oklahoma) in Thursday's
games may fuel your accusation (did you have a tough first round, Randy?), but 
first-round games are pretty easy to have a high percentage on. The only ones 
I missed on Friday were the two big upsets, Cleveland St. and Ark. L-R. Do you 
think I would have had Northeastern advancing to the final 16 if I was trying 
to cheat? 

As you can tell, I'm not a veteran netter. If the person running the contest 
wants to disqualify me, I promise I'll still sleep at night. 

Mark Fredrickson