[fa.laser-lovers] Summary on Imagen maintenance

laser-lovers@uw-beaver (laser-lovers) (06/14/84)

From: alfred%ct.csnet@csnet-relay.arpa
The following is a short summary of the responses
I received from my request for user experiences
with the reliability of Imagen Imprint-10 laser
printers and the wisdom of buying a maintenance
contract.

There were seven respondents in all.  Four currently
have no maintenance contract (although one of these
was planning to buy a contract) and three currently
have contracts.  The people without contracts
uniformly recommended not bothering to buy one, because
of the overall reliability of their printers, as well
as the low usage of our printer.  In addition, two
respondents mentioned that the few service calls they
did have were inexpensive.  Most of the sites (like us)
for the most part just feed them and watch them run.
One of these sites indicated really heavy usage but no
untoward failures with his printer.  On the other hand, one
of the three respondents with maintenance contracts
indicated heavy usage and a low degree of reliability.
The other respondents with contracts indicated that their
failure rate was low and that they were happy with the service
they received when a call was necessary, although one respondent
mentioned that consideration was being given to dropping the
contract due to lack of problems with the printer.

Specific problems mentioned included: readjusting/cleaning corona
wires (when print quality deteriorated or a wire began to arc),
replacing scratched/worn drums (due to normal wear, improper paper
jams, or improper dispersant tray removal), broken belts, and bus errors,
etc., that cause the interface to hang (requiring rebooting to clear).
We have seen a fair number of the first and last of these happen with
our own machine.

My impression is that, if you really abuse your printer, you
should buy a contract; otherwise it is cheaper to just pay
as you need work done.  Several respondents mentioned that some of
their service calls result from 'user error' or 'dirty machines'.
The general consensus seems to be that, if you allow only those who
have been shown the proper thing to do to mess with the machine, and
you do regular cleaning (PM), you get a machine that gives little
trouble (assuming low to moderate usage).

Alfred

P.S. The figure of $600 I quoted in my original message should be
ignored.  It turns out that the person who arranged the purchase of
our machine last year wanted a maintenance contract as well.  Since
there was at that time no local maintenance organization, Imagen
quoted us a contract for doing it themselves.  Since we are just outside
Dallas, air fare and accommodations had to be added to the 'normal'
maintenance fee...