[fa.laser-lovers] "Oh no" recursion

laser-lovers@uw-beaver (05/13/85)

From: Les Earnest <LES@SU-AI.ARPA>

As a BWM owner and Imagen shareholder I am naturally interested
in Brian Reid's generous offer to provide print samples from his
Scribe-Laserwriter system, given in his "Oh no" message of 11 May.
[To Brian: will you settle for my sending you a self-addressed
Stanford interdepartmental mail envelope or must I really provide
a stamped envelope?  If the latter, how much postage will be needed?]

Brian chastises Paul Rubin for saying about the Laserwriter that
"the intercharacter spacing is uneven and sloppy-looking."  Brian says,
"This has nothing to do with the LaserWriter.  . . . there is nothing wrong
with the intercharacter spacing on the LaserWriter."  Inasmuch as the
Postscript software on the printer, the fonts, and presumably the
intercharacter spacing tables were all developed by Adobe, this is a bit
hard to swallow.  Mr. Reid seems to be telling Mr. Rubin that he should
not believe his eyes.

Brian goes on to say that perhaps the problem is caused by obsolescent
software on the Macintosh.  This leaves unanswered the question of who
is responsible for system inadequacies of this sort and when they are
likely to be fixed.

The thesis that this problem is Apple's fault would be plausible except
for one thing: the print samples developed and distributed by Adobe show
the same "uneven and sloppy-looking" intercharacter spacing.  A strong
clue as to why this has happened appeared in the April 27 message from
Ed Taft of Adobe to Laser-Lovers, where he draws a distinction between
"geometric scaling" and "typographic scaling."  He then remarks that
"In PostScript, geometric scaling is the default, because it minimizes
the burden on composition programs."  Unfortunately, the rounding errors
intrinsic in geometric scaling produce the uneven intercharacter spacing
that various viewers have seen.

It is reasonable to ask why Adobe does not normally do "typographic scaling,"
whatever Mr. Taft means by that.  I would speculate that the reason is
that it is hard to do within the neat "transform anything" model on which
Postscript is based.

Actually, the term "typographic scaling" is rather ambiguous.  I know of
five different classes of scaling that are in use in modern composition
systems and there are likely some more in use in systems that I have
not reviewed.  Most of them produce much better looking text than
geometric scaling.

If Brian Reid has succeeded in producing well-spaced text with his
Laserwriter, I will be very interested in seeing it and learning more about
how it was done.  (For what it is worth, a couple of weeks ago I privately
offered Brian some print samples of new fonts that I had just filched from
Imagen.  He responded that he already had all that stuff and that his
informant inside Imagen was keeping him well supplied.)

Responding to Brian's remark about defensive BMW owners, though I have
purchased five BMW cars so far, I decline to defend them totally because
my kids keep totalling them.  As a consequence, I cannot yet afford to have
my own Laserwriter at home, let alone one of the better laser printers.
:-)
Cheers,
	Les Earnest

laser-lovers@uw-beaver (05/13/85)

From: Brian Reid <reid@Glacier>

Les, we have some Imagen printers at Stanford that have been producing
absolute total ugly disgusting swill for years. You should be thankful
that I have not tried to convince people that this is the fault of the
printers, rather than the fault of the "whole system" environment
including the fonts and the spacing information that the formatting
programs have to work with. 

When I have the time, I will put together an explanation of scaling,
including geometric and typographic, for the benefit of you and anybody
else who might not understand it. In the interim, I guess that as long
as you keep identifying yourself as an Imagen stockholder in any
message where you flame at LaserWriters, things should be OK.

[Disclaimer: I am a paid consultant to Adobe, though nothing I say in
this forum (or anywhere else) represents their position, and in fact
they read it on Laser-Lovers like the rest of you.]

laser-lovers@uw-beaver (05/14/85)

From: Rich Cohen <CMP.COHEN@UTEXAS-20.ARPA>

Brian,

I have seen two samples of LaserWriter output, one printed from a
Macintosh, the other printed from Scribe output.  In both cases there
were occurences of awkward character spacing within a word.  The
instances that I recall all involved spacing around the letter "o".  I
don't know what version of the software was involved in either case, but
there are spacing problems.

I use Scribe and an Imagen printer for my regular printing, and will
agree that the current CMR/AMR fonts are not the most beautiful
available.  However, I have not noticed the same sort of spacing errors.
(Of course, Scribe does not appear handle ligatures, but that's another
story.)

-- Rich
-------