elt@astrovax.UUCP (Ed Turner) (05/17/84)
[This line is not necessary if you start your message flush left on line 1.] I need some information and/or (better yet) references to articles about the hazards of x-ray exposure from CRT's and color monitors. I am under the impression that there is some reason for concern about this but that the problem can be easily overcome by plexiglass screen covers, for example. This is only a vague impression though and I would like some facts. I need this information for an advisory committee on the use of computers in the schools in our town (on which I serve). We want to know if the kids glued to their color monitors putting LOGO turtles through their paces are getting any significant exposure. Please forgive my posting this to several groups as I can't see which one is actually the correct place. Please reply by mail if you like. Thanks in advance, Ed Turner astrovax!elt
henry@utzoo.UUCP (Henry Spencer) (05/18/84)
The following quote is of interest: Measurements performed under normal VDT [video display terminal] operating conditions by the FDA and NIOSH have *never* shown X-ray emissions significantly above the natural background radiation to which we are all exposed. In order for our laboratories to produce any higher levels of X-radiation, they had to resort to extreme conditions, including maximum misadjustments of both user and service controls, excessive line voltages, and intentionally induced component failure -- conditions which in some cases led to illegible video displays and permanent damage to the units. Based on our measurements of ionizing and non-ionizing radiation, we do not believe that VDTs should pose a radiation risk to those who operate them. This is from Dr. John C. Villforth, Director of the Bureau of Radiological Health at the FDA, writing in Byte (page 37, Dec 1982 issue). The emphasis on "never" is in the original. Villforth is known for persistent agitation for better radiation protection for dental X-ray machines, so he can hardly be considered a "see no evil" type. -- Henry Spencer @ U of Toronto Zoology {allegra,ihnp4,linus,decvax}!utzoo!henry
pc@hplabsb.UUCP (Patricia Collins) (05/22/84)
On a recent National Public Radio show, a scientist spoke on the radiation hazards of CRTs. The radiation level from a PROPERLY ADJUSTED CRT is 2 orders of magnitude LOWER than the radiation from another human being (due to naturally occurring radiation from chemicals within human bodies). That, in turn was a couple of orders of magnitude lower than the amount of radiation received by the average person (per year) from the sun. Similar measurements should be available on X-ray dosages. My opinion is that the biggest hazard from sitting in front of a CRT/monitor all day is not from EMR (etc.). I would be most concerned about the inactivity. Our bodies need motion, exercise, and change to function optimally. Although, it is possible to improve "productivity" at a CRT by putting in uninterrupted hours of concentrated thought/programming/data entry, our minds also benefit from short breaks. (Refer to your Psych 101 text for details.) For further info: "Health Protection for Operators of VDTs/CRTs, NYCOSH, 32 Union Sq., Rm. 404, NYC, NY 10003 ($1) G.W. Wolfe, "Ionizing Radiation and VDTs," Kilobaud Microcomputer, July 1981 W.E. Murray, et al, "A Radiation and Industrial Hygiene Survey of Video Display Terminal Operations, Aug. 1981 R.C. Peterson, et al. "Nonionizing Electromagnetic Radiation Association with Video-Display Terminals" Patricia Collins hplabs