[net.misc] CMU studies flames on networks

cbd@iham1.UUCP (Carl Deitrick) (10/05/84)

I think there is another reason why flames are so prevalent on the network:
Contributors are not talking to a person, they're talking to a *machine*.
Intellectually, they must know their articles are read by real people, but
when they type the article in, they're talking to a *machine*.  They can
rant, rave, curse, use sharp language, be judgemental, boorish, sarcastic
or whatever else they want and THE MACHINE DOESN'T CARE!  If they tried the
same thing with a real person, they'd have their lights punched out.  Talking
to the computer like that has great therapeutic effect, and I do it all the
time. I just never post it to the net.
	The only question of substance here is why scientists want to study
such obvious subjects.  They must be social scientists. :-)
					Carl Deitrick
					iham1!cbd