[net.kids] Mr. Arndt Responds to Mr. Wolman

kenw@lcuxc.UUCP (K Wolman) (02/14/85)

Ken Arndt recently posted this response to a note I posted on
spanking.  For some reason, he chose to put it in net.jokes.  Since
he believes it is germane to the issue, I have taken the liberty of
reposting it without comment.
**************************

>Ken:
>        I was so glad to read your views on spanking in your recent posting.
>At last I feel that I can come out of the closet.  I had thought that perhaps
>I was the only one who felt this way.  I reference your statements about why
>one should strike a child on the bum.  When you said one benefit was that it
>wasn't necessary to LOOK at the child when so doing I opened the closet door.
>
>You see, I have long hated to look my children in the eye when taking them to
>task for their infractions.  I could see their little minds at work wrecking
>vengence upon me.  In my mind's eye I could see little Ken pushing off the 
>ice floe upon which my wheel chair sits and launching it out into the icy
>depths.  I don't want them to take it personal.
>
>Soooo.  I have developed the 'Kindness Box'.  I'll send you the plans if you
>want.  It's easy to build over a weekend.  Let me describe it to you.  It is
>a three sided box big enough to fit the child into and it hinges on the wall
>on one side.  The top is fitted with a hole through which a broom stick fits.
>(I got the idea while watching an educational show on old Colonial life.
>>From a butter maker.)  When it gets to be 'that time' just swing the box away
>from the wall and fit the child inside and swing the box back against the wall.
>Now he can't see or be seen.  Work the broom stick up and down vigorously a
>few times (depending upon the infraction) and hey presto!  Dicipline without
>eye contact.  I have placed one of my boxing gloves on the end of the broom
>stick inside the box to prevent indentations that might be hard to explain.
>
>I really feel better about the whole process of dicipline.  I know I have to do
>it but it is not a pleasant task.  I've explained it all to them and I'm sure 
>they don't blame me because with the 'Kindness Box' it is all so impersonal.
>
>There's just one thing I'd like to ask you about.  Are you SURE that just 
>because there is no eye contact during dicipline they don't hold it against
>you?  I mean, in my case, . . . well, I have . . . concerns.  For example,
>last night I went down to the kitchen to fix myself a cup of tea and when I
>opened the cabinet a cascade of pots and pans and sharp edged toys hit me!
>It's just a freak accident like they swear, right?  
>
>Then why is it I have an awful foreboding about going down to the cellar???
>
>Let me know what you think, buddy.
>
>Concerned in New Hampshire,
>
>Ken Arndt
>
-- 
                                Ken Wolman
              Bell Communications Research @ Livingston, NJ
                                lcuxc!kenw
                              (201) 740-4565

       ". . . Toto, I don't think we're in the Bronx anymore. . . ."