regard@ttidcc.UUCP (Adrienne Regard) (08/12/85)
>In article <640@ttidcc.UUCP> regard@ttidcc.UUCP (Adrienne Regard) writes: >> >>Some of us are just plain selfish, and I for one am willing to admit it. >>... >>He may be the father, but he's not the active party and some jobs ya >>just gotta do your own way. Bill Taggart Writes: >Gee, wasn't your husband an active party at the child's conception. >It is a shame that some people are so selfish and self centered that they >can't share one of life's most precious moments -- the birth of a new >child. Bill, I'm not married. My "husband" doesn't come into it. The father of the baby was an active party in the conception, but he is not _necessarily_ an active party in the delivery. In fact, he'd rather NOT be, and I'd rather NOT have him be, if his responses would be distracting. I answered a posting regarding someone's _solicitations of opinions_ re allowing children to participate in the birth of siblings. I did not invite your uninformed and intrusive comments. Isn't it a "shame" that you feel justified making denegrating comments about people you don't know? >Maybe my wife's and my desire to have the whole family participate is >considered out-of-step with the 'me' generation ... but that's their >problem, not mine. Maybe, and maybe not, and the decision is up to you. YOUR decision and opinion isn't MY problem -- thank goodness I don't have the temperment to malign YOU for YOUR free choice. I think your comments are rude and uncalled for. Adrienne Regard