woods@hao.UUCP (Greg Woods) (11/29/83)
First of all, from my understanding of these two groups, this topic does not belong in the expert subgroup, which was intended for technical discussions *directly* related to astronomy. This is sort of a peripheral topic (albeit an important one!), and so belongs in the more general group net.astro . I have posted this article to both groups in an attempt to move the discussion to where I think it belongs. Woods' first law (forgive me if someone has already claimed this) of scientific computing is, whatever computing power is available will eventually become saturated, i.e. it is never enough. We have two VAX 11/750's, a PDP 11/70, and a share of two CRAY-1As, and we still manage to just about saturate everything (well, the second VAX isn't yet ready for general use; it is being used to bring up 4.2BSD). Of course, we have to share the CRAYs with the rest of NCAR, including the large 3-D cloud models. We are also responsible for a good share of the SMM (Solar Maximum Mission) data analysis, a share which is likely to increase after the scheduled repair of the SMM satellite by the space shuttle astronauts (I think it is STS-13, but I'm not positive). [This is one reason we just bought the two new VAXen!]. I'm willing to bet that any scientific institution reading this would report a similar situation at their facility. GREG -- {ucbvax!hplabs | allegra!nbires | decvax!brl-bmd | harpo!seismo | ihnp4!kpno} !hao!woods