[net.astro] 2010 review's review's review

carlton@masscomp.UUCP (Carlton Hommel) (12/25/84)

In article <524@dataio.UUCP> del@dataio.UUCP (Erik Lindberg) writes:
>> 
>> 	I thought the monoliths merely increased the *density* of Jupiter,
>> not the mass.  The observation from the Leonov that Jupiter is shrinking
>> would support either idea, though.
>> 
>
>Actually, the theory is that Jupitor was very close to being a sun
>anyway, so only a little upset was necessary to push it over the edge.
>The monoliths were supposed to add enough *mass* to cause it to
>implode, causing a tremendous increase in *density*.

My impression is that the monoliths were taking the gas from Jupiter's
atmosphere (which is most of the planet, after all) and converting it
through a virus replication process into solid matter.  (More monoliths,
that is.)  This compaction in mass, and subsiquent increase in density,
is what triggered the solar phoenix.  

	"In any case, we're talking about a technology that can
    do  _anything_ that doesn't defy the laws of physics"  p. 296
I don't think the monoliths created extra mass, just compacted what was
already there.

	"...Well, if I'm not allowed to add about ten Jupiter 
    masses, or change the gravitational constant, I suppose I'll
    have to make the planet denser- hmm, that's an idea..."
	"When the core became dense enough, Jupiter would collapse-
    probably in a matter of seconds.  The temperature would rise high
    enough to start fustion." pp. 317-318

Quotations from my second-hand Del Ray paperback.

And in the east, a star was born...
Merry Christmas, everyone.