[net.astro] large Dobsonian telescopes

GMS@psuvm.BITNET (07/03/85)

>
>>                      ... I have noticed several light weight large
>>aperture reflectors described in the pages of Sky and Telescope. Does
>>anyone know about any commercial versions of these monsters, or do they
>>only appear at Stellafane and Riverside?
>
>Coulter Optical Company makes humungeous "Dobson"-style altazimuth
>Newtonian reflectors.  They work and are good values.  The thirteen-inch
>Odyssey I is common at star parties in the San Francisco area,and widely
>respected as a deep-sky instrument.  It's about as large as one human
>being can conveniently haul around and set up.  The ten-inch version is
>substantially more portable.
>
>(I have no financial interest in Coulter.)
     
I have no financial interest in Coulter either, however you forgot to
      mention that they also make 17.5-inch and 29-inch models.  These
      are really big, and although I've never used one myself I've
      been told that they are really good for deep-sky objects not
      requiring much magnification (with respect to the aperture, that
      is -- the classic problem with an RFT).
     
      Check out 'Sky & Telescope' or 'Astronomy' magazines for an ad and
       address.
     
(I certainly wish *I* had one!!!!)
     
Gerry Santoro
Penn State University
. . . !psuvax1!santoro (uucp)
. . . !psuvax1!psuvm.bitnet!gms (uucp --> bitnet)
gms @ psuvm  (bitnet)
santoro @ penn-state  (csnet)
     

freeman@spar.UUCP (Jay Freeman) (07/08/85)

[<munch>]


>>>                      ... I have noticed several light weight large
>>>aperture reflectors described in the pages of Sky and Telescope. ...

>>Coulter Optical Company makes humungeous "Dobson"-style altazimuth
>>Newtonian reflectors. ... thirteen-inch ... ten-inch ...

>... they also make 17.5-inch and 29-inch models ...

And for that matter an eight-inch.  I only mentioned the 13" and 10"
because they are the only models I have actually observed with.  Several
people in the Bay Area have 17.5-inch optics mounted in their own mechanical
assemblies -- the optics I have seen seem reasonable.

Has any net reader any first-hand experience with either the 17.5, the 29
or the 8?


-- 
Jay Reynolds Freeman (Schlumberger Palo Alto Research)(canonical disclaimer)