[net.astro] Science and Astrology

jefff@cadovax.UUCP (Jeffery H. Fields) (08/02/85)

>Lack of proof of existance does *NOT* constitute proof of lack of existance.
>Or did your scientific training skip over basic logic?
>
>				Sunny

I agree, but lack of proof is the antithesis of the scientific method.

-- 

				Jeff Fields
				{ucbvax,ihnp4,decvax}!trwrb!cadovax!jefff

Pax vobiscum.