[net.astro] Large apertutre vs. small for nebular seeing

naticchioni@nrlabs.DEC (02/11/86)

	NEWSGROUP: net.astro
	PATH: decwrl!
	SUBJECT: Deep Sky Viewing Telescope.
	POSTED: February 7, 1986
	ORGANIZATION: Digitial Equipment Corp. Design & Evaluation Lab,
		Norhtboro, Ma.



	I AM INTERESTED IN BUILDING A 13 TO 14 IN REFLECTING TELESCOPE FOR 
DEEP SKY VIEWING OF NEBULARS.  I HAVE A 4.25" F/10 NEWTONIAN THAT I USE NOW
FROM 35X TO 200X BUT WOULD LIKE A WIDER FIELD OF VIEW AND A BRIGHTER IMAGE.
	THERE ARE SEVERAL COMPANIES THAT SELL LIGHTWEIGHT 1/8 WAVE MIRRORS
AT F/4.5 TO F/6 AND THEY CLAIM THIS IS WHAT I WANT.  I AM HOPING TO KEEP THE
COST OF THE SYSTEM BOTH IN TIME AND MONEY MINIMAL BUT STILL HAVE A GOOD VIEW.
THE SHORT FOCUS NEWTONIAN SEEMS TO BE THE WAY TO GO BUT I HAVE BEEN READING
THAT A SMALLER MORE ACCURATE MIRROR WITH A LONGER F RATIO IS BETTER.

	IS THERE A TRADE OFF POINT IN SIZE, ACCURACY, AND F RATIO?

	I WOULD LIKE ANY RECOMENDATION ON WHAT OTHERS HAVE USE AND WHY?

	IS THERE ANY GOOD REFERENCES I COULD USE?

	ANY DATA OR FORMULAS WOULD ALSO BE APPRECATED.

				THANKYOU FOR YOUR HELP
				STEVEN M. NATICCHIONI
				DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP.
				NRO5/F2
				30 FORBES ROAD
				NORTHBORO, MA    01532
				(617) 351-4862 	
P.S. "A LITTLE EXPERIENCE REPLACES A LOT OF THEORY!"

	NRLABS::NATICCHIONI