[net.tv.da] Was the EMP realistic. Probably not.

bstempleton@watmath.UUCP (Brad Templeton) (11/25/83)

When the first nuke blew up over Kansas City, I assume we all noticed
the EMP effects - meters going off scale, power grid blowing and
cars stalling.   On this point I thought the film was a bit off.  The
electrical system of a typical car, and certainly that of a motorcycle,
is very simple and based on high voltage, high current circuits.  Even
a big EMP would not affect this.  A car with a computer controlled
ignition system might die, but little else would.  And certainly there
would be no problems restarting them.

Another note is that the car is encased in a metal box, perhaps
a faraday cage against EM radiation.  On the other hand, the EMP is
a full-spectrum pulse from zero frequency up to x-rays, so I'm not sure
what would happen here.

Finally, aside from a few minor problems, and the silly x-ray effect,
the movie wasn't too bad.  It was just a disaster flick, and didn't seem
that slanted at all.  (I am not pro-freeze or pro-arms)  Not worth
the Moral Minority fuss.  In fact, all that Jerry did was promote the
viewership of the movie.
-- 
	Brad Templeton - Waterloo, Ont. (519) 886-7304

ld@hpda.UUCP (Larry Dwyer) (11/28/83)

#R:watmath:-617800:hpda:18300001:000:1431
hpda!ld    Nov 27 17:10:00 1983

The very least they could have  done  with  the  electro-magnetic
pulse  (EMP) was to have it arrive at the same time as the flash.
It seems to me that both electro-magnetic waves and  light  waves
travel at the speed of light (or the speed of sound, or the speed
of a snail, or some such thing).

Of course, if Hollywood had ARRANGED it to arrive  simultaneously
with  the flash, no one would have noticed the meter in the auto-
mobile flopping to-and-fro because they would have  been  blinded
(at  least  temporarily)  by the brilliance of the flash.  From a
television point of view, this would not have  made  a  very  in-
teresting  shot.  This demonstrates that TDA was just another at-
tempt by the mogols in tinseltown to try  to  make  a  fast  buck
(claiming  it  was  as  accurate  as  possible to get everyone to
watch).

The EMP, which is generated in the first millisecond (or  so)  of
the blast, is highly destructive of transistorized equipment, but
automobile ignition systems should survive.   It  might  peg  the
daylights  out of some of the sensitive meters in a car (the ones
with lots of windings), but not the entire electrical system.

By the way, if it is not true that the both wave fronts would ar-
rive  at  the  same  time,  then  someone  ought  to patent these
faster-than-light waves and sell them to the SETI people who  can
use it to send messages to the stars!


		Larry Dwyer
		ucbvax!hpda!ld

henry@utzoo.UUCP (Henry Spencer) (11/29/83)

Cars with electronic (not necessarily computerized) ignitions are most
definitely vulnerable to EMP.  There was at least one incident of such
cars being knocked out accidentally during EMP simulation work in the
US Southwest.  Non-electronic ignitions I'm not sure about.  The diodes
in the alternators might be vulnerable, although they're much tougher
parts than the control circuits of electronic ignitions.
-- 
				Henry Spencer @ U of Toronto Zoology
				{allegra,ihnp4,linus,decvax}!utzoo!henry

eric@aplvax.UUCP (11/29/83)

	I am not an expert on EMP, but if EMP would damage meters
because of their windings, it seems to me that it would also damage
the coil, wiring harness, etc.

-- 
					eric
					...!seismo!umcp-cs!aplvax!eric

johnc@dartvax.UUCP (John Cabell) (12/01/83)

  I'm not sure, but I think that the missile sends out the EMP
befor it hits.  This is probably wrong, but that it the way
I thought it happened.
                          From the Deep Dark Dungeon of Cantel,
                          Theodrick, alias johnc
                          :->