howard@garfield.UUCP (Howard . Campbell) (11/24/84)
Well, then, in what languages DO REAL programmers program?
( Do real programmers also prefer wireheading to foreign substances
as an inducer of artificial pleasure? )
Howard
Campbell
at:
{akgua, allegra, dalcs!dreacad, ihnp4, utcsrgv}!garfield!howard
Memorial University of Newfoundlandyosh@hou2e.UUCP (M.CHING) (11/26/84)
I thought there was only one REAL programming language for REAL programmers... ... "C". Dave Bloom Holmdel, NJ .
rcook@uiucuxc.UUCP (11/29/84)
I think the only two REAL languages for programmers are: 1. 'c' 2. assembly ( In that Order ) What you can't do in one, you can do in the other.
srm@nsc.UUCP (Richard Mateosian) (12/02/84)
In article <36200012@uiucuxc.UUCP> rcook@uiucuxc.UUCP writes: > I think the only two REAL languages for programmers are: > > 1. 'c' > 2. assembly When I was a REAL programmer, a program (for the IBM 650) was a column of 10-digit numbers. Comments were for sissies. Assemblers existed (SAP and SOAP) but REAL programmers didn't use them. Fortunately, I stopped being a REAL programmer nearly 25 years ago, and now I don't think there are any REAL programming languages. -- Richard Mateosian {cbosgd,decwrl,fortune,hplabs,ihnp4,seismo}!nsc!srm nsc!srm@decwrl.ARPA
eugene@ames.UUCP (Eugene Miya) (12/03/84)
> In article <36200012@uiucuxc.UUCP> rcook@uiucuxc.UUCP writes: > > > I think the only two REAL languages for programmers are: > > > > 1. 'c' > > 2. assembly > > Fortunately, I stopped being a REAL programmer nearly 25 years ago, and now > I don't think there are any REAL programming languages. > -- > Richard Mateosian > {cbosgd,decwrl,fortune,hplabs,ihnp4,seismo}!nsc!srm nsc!srm@decwrl.ARPA So who wants to be a REAL programmer? I'd rather be an unREAL programmer [an imagary programmer? would you believe complex?]. Oh, say can you C? [I do and I like it.] --eugene miya NASA Ames Res. Ctr. {hplabs,ihnp4,dual,hao,vortex}!ames!aurora!eugene emiya@ames-vmsb.ARPA
stevev@tekchips.UUCP (Steve Vegdahl) (12/04/84)
> I think the only two REAL languages for programmers are: > > 1. 'c' > 2. assembly > > ( In that Order ) > > > What you can't do in one, you can do in the other. Both of the above-mentioned languages may be REAL, but they're not RATIONAL. :-) ******************************** Steve Vegdahl NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR Computer Research Lab. typos Tektronix, Inc. logical errors Beaverton, Oregon actions of my pet alligator ********************************
geb@cadre.UUCP (12/04/84)
Real programmers toggle the machine language program in using the switches on the front panel.
bing@lanierrnd.UUCP (Bing Bang) (12/06/84)
In article <> rcook@uiucuxc.UUCP writes: > > I think the only two REAL languages for programmers are: > > 1. 'c' > 2. assembly > > ( In that Order ) > > > What you can't do in one, you can do in the other. A person after my own heart!!! unitl next time++; ...lanierrnd!bing
hollis@ucf-cs.UUCP (Ken Hollis) (12/06/84)
Naw, naw, I wanna be a virtual programmer...
William Kendall Hollis (Ken)
...decvax!ucf-cs!hollis or ...duke!ucf-cs!hollis
hollis.ucf-cs@Csnet-Relaycanopus@amdahl.UUCP (Flaming Asteroid) (12/07/84)
Real programmers can code FORTRAN in any language!
--
Frank Dibbell (408-746-6493) ...!{ihnp4,hplabs,amd,nsc}!amdahl!canopus
[The views expressed herein are not necessarily the views of my
employer, or myself, for that matter]ron@wjvax.UUCP (Ron Christian) (01/08/85)
REAL programmers burn the object code directly into ROM.
--
Ron Christian (Watkins-Johnson Co. San Jose, Calif.)
{pesnta,twg,ios,qubix,turtlevax,tymix}!wjvax!ronbrian@digi-g.UUCP (Merlyn Leroy <Brian Westley>) (01/12/85)
>REAL programmers burn the object code directly into ROM.
BEFORE they ever test it!
--
Merlyn Leroy
"No funny quotes"