[net.lang.mod2] Modula-2 compilers for the PC

jjh@se-sd.UUCP (06/05/86)

---

   I'm in the market for a Modula-2 compiler for my IBM clone, and I'd like
   to hear from people who've had experience with the various available
   compilers. Currently I'm looking at compilers from three companies:
   Logitech, Interface Technologies, and Workman and Associates
   (currently available for CP/M only but ready for DOS Real Soon Now).
   I'm particularly concerned that the compiler does NOT have a 64K space
   limitation (a la Turbo Pascal), and that it be able to produce EXE files.
   The ability to import code generated from other compilers would also be
   a plus. Anyone out there had good/bad experiences using the above
   compilers? Are there other compiliers "out there" that I haven't heard
   about? Any experiences/opinions you may care to relate will be greatly
   appreciated.


                                       Jim Hayes

Disclaimer: My opinions are correct; they are, therefore, probably
            not those of my employer

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                        |
"A statesman -- is a dead politician"   |   Jim Hayes
"Lord knows we need more statesmen"     |   ...!sdcsvax!ncr-sd!se-sd!jjh

jjh@se-sd.UUCP (jjh) (06/09/86)

   Many thanks to everyone who responded, either in letters or postings,
   to my request for information about PC Modula-2 compilers. General
   consensus seems to be that Logitech puts out a solid system that
   will meet my needs, while the compiler from Interface Technologies
   has some definite drawbacks. People who've used Workman & Associates
   CP/M compiler have been pleased with the results, but, since I'm
   impatient and their compiler isn't ready for DOS yet, I think I'll go
   with Logitech. Thanks again.


                                       Jim Hayes

   P.S. My apologies if this posting appears twice -- our mailing system
        choked on the first attempt and I wanted to be sure it got out

Disclaimer: My opinions are correct; they are, therefore, probably
            not those of my employer

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                        |
"A statesman -- is a dead politician"   |   Jim Hayes
"Lord knows we need more statesmen"     |   ...!sdcsvax!ncr-sd!se-sd!jjh

zemon@fritz.UUCP (06/12/86)

I have Interface Technologies' M2-SDS and am pretty happy with
it.  It is less slick than the LogiTech product seems to be from
reading the ads but is a lot less expensive.  All I wanted was
something to let me learn about the language and I'm satisfied
with the product for that.  I'd rather develop serious code in C
simply because my Aztec C compiler has a *much* better runtime
library.  (Has anyone replicated the power of the standard I/O
library in a Modula module?)

The tech support people are very helpful and knowledgable.
Furthermore, ITC runs a Fidonet BBS in Texas.  Some sections are
reserved for customers (like M2-SDS updates and bug fixes) and
the sysops are the tech support people.

	-- Art Z.
-- 
	-- Art Zemon
	   FileNet Corp.
	   ...! {decvax, ihnp4, ucbvax} !trwrb!felix!zemon