sdyer@bbncca.ARPA (Steve Dyer) (04/17/84)
Half read your msges on this subj as they scrolled by in the digest. The SF ord did not just extend protection to any old cohabitor. You would have been required to register your partnership. And you couldn't change partners more frequently than every six months. (That is, after telling the city you had dissolved a partnership, you'd have top wait six mo. before you could file a new declaration.) Given this, why would a (non-homophobe) oppose the ord? We're barred from marriage - that won't change any time soon, I don't think - so this is an attempt to give us some of the benefits. Why shouldn't we be able to to get insurance benefits? (Or for that matter, do a lot of other things, like filing taxes and inheriting easily, which wouldn't be changed by this ordinance.) ------- Posted for bbncca!handel by bbncca!sdyer -- /Steve Dyer {decvax,linus,ima}!bbncca!sdyer sdyer@bbncca.ARPA