arndt@lymph.DEC (10/03/84)
(You asked for imput!) A great idea. That way those not interested in any of the points I have raised can be spared dealing with them. From me at least!!! I have never wanted to drive anyone from the use of the net, which after all IS a great means to exchange ideas (and flame, etc.). Question. Is this a kind of stepping back into the closet?? I mean I have never really prevented anyone from placing an item on motss, have I? What if someone wants to talk about another subject you don't want to on the new mod.net.? Do you form a mod.mod.net? I really think that the "damage" I have done on the new is overrated. After all, all those people out there who are "n"ing my postings seem to pop up from time to time with a reply (you included Steve) that shows that they are READING my postings. Perhaps it is just YOU that needs a rest Steve! From me I mean. Let's try a trial separation. No more "golden showers" with each other on the net for a while, ok. Could I ask you to continue to read the old motss if you form a new one? You often have some good and interesting points to make. (Don't get hot now!) I have an idea!! How about it I answer some of my points from the homosexual point of view? I mean there are some very good things to be said that no one has posted. I don't mean AIDS is good for you, but things the smarter Homo- sexuals are coming up with in their "struggle to be free." You know, the ones who don't run. I see a couple of typos above. Sigh. The public school graduate's burden. Well, keep chargin' Steve, Ken Arndt
gam@amdahl.UUCP (Gordon A. Moffett) (10/04/84)
Mod.motss?! Who's brilliant idea was this?
Ken Arndt's rebuttal to this was just great.
--
Gordon A. Moffett ...!{ihnp4,hplabs,amd,nsc}!amdahl!gam
[ The opinons expressed in this article are completely fictious. Any
similarity between these opinions and the opinions of any persons
living or dead is entirely coincidental. ]saquigley@watmath.UUCP (Sophie Quigley) (10/23/84)
> >I have an idea!! How about it I answer some of my points from the homosexual >point of view? I mean there are some very good things to be said that no one >has posted. I don't mean AIDS is good for you, but things the smarter Homo- >sexuals are coming up with in their "struggle to be free." You know, the ones >who don't run. > >Ken Arndt Please do Ken, you've been telling everybody in this newsgroup that they are not capable of defending themselves properly, and that they'd better learn fast since THEY'll be coming to get us soon. You claim to have some expertise in the matter, let's hear it! Sophie Quigley ...!{clyde,ihnp4,decvax}!watmath!saquigley