riddle@im4u.UUCP (08/20/85)
>> At the risk of flogging a dead horse, let me suggest yet another reason why >> we should prefer ''gay'' to ''homosexual''. I have known gay bisexuals, >> non-gay bisexuals, and (strangest of the lot) non-gay homosexuals. It all >> has to do with how you identify yourself, not whom you sleep with. Whoops, I must have missed something. "Non-gay homosexuals"? Apparently you're making a denotative distinction here between "gay" and "homosexual" (as opposed to all the connotative distinctions that have already been made in this newsgroup). Can you clarify? --- Prentiss Riddle ("Aprendiz de todo, maestro de nada.") --- {ihnp4,harvard,seismo,gatech}!ut-sally!riddle riddle@ut-sally.UUCP --- riddle@ut-sally.ARPA, riddle%zotz@ut-sally, riddle%im4u@ut-sally