scw@cepu.UUCP (Stephen C. Woods) (08/15/84)
*<zaaaaaaaaaaapp!
Well once again the bug strikes, this was reported by the next site down from me
I checked my version and it too was munched. I have fixed the bug here (months
ago).
Will sites on this chain please check and report to the net.
ucla-cs!cepu!trwrba!trwrb!sdcrdcf!hplabs!hpda!fortune!wall
Relay-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site ucla-cs.ARPA
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site fortune.UUCP
Path: ucla-cs!cepu!trwrba!trwrb!sdcrdcf!hplabs!hpda!fortune!wall
From: wall@fortune.UUCP (Jim Wall)
Newsgroups: net.micro
Subject: Re: another *parity* argument
Message-ID: <3987@fortune.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 13-Aug-84 14:39:38 PDT
Date-Received: Tue, 14-Aug-84 11:32:07 PDT
References: <692@sri-arpa.UUCP>, <1217@vax2.fluke.UUCP>
Organization: Fortune Systems, Redwood City, CA
Lines: 22
is, but you cannot be sure of the memory
anymore, so trying to save portions of it will just cause grief.
Remember that memory failures are rarely just one address affected,
most are caused by power surges, ESD, and other similar events.
EDC is better, but not at all perfect, and for the cost isn't worth
it in my book. Now fault tolerence is entirely a different story....
-Jim Wall
!amd!fortune!wall
--
Stephen C. Woods (VA Wadsworth Med Ctr./UCLA Dept. of Neurology)
uucp: { {ihnp4, uiucdcs}!bradley, hao, trwrb, sdcsvax!bmcg}!cepu!scw
ARPA: cepu!scw@ucla-cs CORRECTED location: N 34 3' 9.1" W 118 27' 4.3"faunt@saturn.UUCP (Doug Faunt) (08/16/84)
The article was fine here. ...!hplabs!faunt