diamant@cwruecmp.UUCP (John Diamant) (09/29/83)
I have recently switched from TOPS-20 to UN*X (actually I still use TOPS occasionally) -- I have found that the amount of time involved in learning TOPS is much less than UN*X, mainly due to ? and ESC, but that now that I know both, UN*X is definitely less intrusive (allows me to be more productive). I recently read a comment by someone in net.cog-eng that UN*X is "expert-friendly" and I find that very fitting. I would however like to point out that this discussion would be more appropriate on net.cog-eng than net.unix-wizards. I thus recommend that all further discussion on this topic be confined to cog-eng. John Diamant Usenet: ...decvax!cwruecmp!diamant CSNet: diamant@Case ARPA: diamant.Case@UDel-Relay
fulk@sunybcs.UUCP (Mark Fulk) (10/04/83)
Of great interest in this connection is the "TOOLS" project at Yale. The authors (Ellis, van Leunen, Mishkin, Nix, et al) have replaced most of the standard TOPS-20 utilities with their own and generally regularized the TOPS-20 environment; they have made many of the potential capabilities of the TOPS-20 kernel usable (background processes, etc.) The main part of the work seems to have been to replace TOPS-20 EXEC with their own version (MUF, similar to the shell); to write a screen mode editor (Z), and to provide mail and news systems. They seem to have stolen from any source with good ideas, mainly from UN*X, and my friends from Yale praise the results to the skies. Descriptions are available as Yale CS Dept. tech reports nos. 231 and 232.