[net.legal] selective enforcement, drivers licences, etc.

ntt@dciem.UUCP (Mark Brader) (05/15/84)

>    I was once stopped by a squad car for no reason while driving,
>    as far as I can tell.  The circumstances:  I was in the only car on
>    the road at the time.  It was broad daylight.  I was driving at exactly
>    the speed limit.  I was not doing anything unusual.

Yes you were, you admitted it yourself.  You were *driving a car on a
public road*.  This is a privilege, for which you need a licence, and as
far as I am concerned, the police are perfectly within their rights in
stopping you to see if you have one.  Of course, if they aren't too busy
to spend much time doing that, something is wrong.

Here, the provincial police sometimes set up safety checks where they pull
over cars more or less at random and test your brakes and the like, and if
your car fails badly enough, you leave it there.  The city police do the
same thing each Christmas to see whether you are intoxicated.  Apparently
the first practice is explicitly legal here, and the second one is squeaked
in under the same law amid some controversy.  Statistics have showed that
lives are being saved.  I approve.

Flames to /dev/null (or net.flame), please.  Rational comments to net.legal
(or to me, but I don't have a lot of time to answer mail now.)

Mark Brader, {decvax|linus|ihnp4|allegra|...}!utzoo!dciem!ntt

ron@brl-vgr.ARPA (Ron Natalie <ron>) (05/15/84)

Unfortunately, stopping people without resonable cause is one of the
freedoms we are supposed to have here which I guess you don't have in
Canada.

-Ron

ntt@dciem.UUCP (Mark Brader) (05/15/84)

In my item posted yesterday, I referred several times to conditions "here"
(e.g., "Here, the provincial police sometimes set up safety checks...")
but I neglected to say where "here" is.  Some of you will see that datum
in the news header.  To the rest of you, sorry, I meant to sign it:

Mark Brader, Toronto, Ont., Canada

seifert@ihuxl.UUCP (D.A. Seifert) (05/16/84)

> Unfortunately, stopping people without resonable cause is one of the
> freedoms we are supposed to have here 

"supposed to" is certainly the key phrase here.  Grrr!
-- 
	_____
       /_____\	   	    That auto-crossing beagle,
      /_______\			      Snoopy
	|___|		    BMWCCA, Windy City Chapter
    ____|___|_____	       ihnp4!ihuxl!seifert