lasher@via.DEC (Lew Lasher - DTN 381-2651) (07/15/85)
"[T]he fact is that 1) there is no such thing as a 'constitutional right to privacy'; and 2) the Supreme Court is the final arbitor (sic) of how the Constitution is to be applied ...." My copy of the U.S. Constitution comes complete with a Fourth Amendment, which protects me from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. This sounds pretty much like a "constitutional right to privacy" to me, as it does to most Supreme Court justices. I think what you were trying to say is that there is no "*ABSOLUTE* constitutional right to privacy" which is hardly newsworthy, since the frontier between a reasonable search and an unreasonable one is a battlefield over which controversies have prolonged for decades. Lew Lasher