ralphw@ius2.cs.cmu.edu (Ralph Hyre) (10/30/85)
In article <825@terak.UUCP> doug@terak.UUCP (Doug Pardee) writes: >Unless someone shows that Jobs was not a company officer at Apple, Jobs >is in deep water with his actions. The "Errors and Omissions" >insurance policy isn't likely to pay off on this one! I suspect that Jobs will try to claim that he was not a company officer at Apple at the time he committed the alleged infractions, since he had no day-to-day operating responsibilities, accoring to what he says. Is the title 'Chairman of the Board' make one a 'real' company officer in absense of responsibilities? (Of course, he was a 'real' company officer until June or so, if that has any bearing on the case) -- - Ralph Internet: ralphw@c.cs.cmu.edu (cmu-cs-c.arpa) Usenet: ralphw@mit-eddie.uucp Fidonet: Ralph Hyre at Fido #385 Pitt-Bull (or maybe Net 129, node 0) Snail Mail: don't bother
mat@amdahl.UUCP (Mike Taylor) (11/03/85)
> In article <825@terak.UUCP> doug@terak.UUCP (Doug Pardee) writes: > > >Unless someone shows that Jobs was not a company officer at Apple, Jobs > >is in deep water with his actions. The "Errors and Omissions" > >insurance policy isn't likely to pay off on this one! > > I suspect that Jobs will try to claim that he was not a company officer at > Apple at the time he committed the alleged infractions, since he had no > day-to-day operating responsibilities, accoring to what he says. > Is the title 'Chairman of the Board' make one a 'real' company officer > in absense of responsibilities? (Of course, he was a 'real' company officer > until June or so, if that has any bearing on the case) > -- He's a 'real' company officer until his resignation has been voted on and accepted by the board of directors, regardless of whether or not he is doing any work. -- Mike Taylor ...!{ihnp4,hplabs,amd,sun}!amdahl!mat [ This may not reflect my opinion, let alone anyone else's. ]