bill@persci.UUCP (William Swan) (11/22/85)
In article <477@zinfandel.UUCP> berry@zinfandel.UUCP (Berry Kercheval) writes: >>Typically, under the First Amendment of the Constitution, pornography is >>not a protected area of speech. This a majority opinion. >Gee, I guess it's naive of me to think that when the Constitution says > "Congress shall make no law respecting [...] >that it means NO LAW, that's it, period. Berry, You are naive only in thinking that the Constitution has anything to do with the practice of law in this country. -- William Swan {ihnp4,decvax,allegra,...}!uw-beaver!tikal!persci!bill