ins_akaa@jhunix.UUCP (Kenneth Adam Arromdee) (11/01/85)
Isn't it strange that the following two claims are being made about the
destruction cross-posting?
1) There was a cross posting to net.bizarre about it's destruction, so if you
were too lazy to respond, it's your fault.
2) It was justifiable to not cross-post to net.bizarre about its destruction
because such postings belong in net.news.group and if you don't bother
to read net.news.group, it's your own fault.
A slight contradiction here... was there or wasn't there a cross-posting?
(As far as I know there wasn't.) Also, the first argument implies that
cross-posting IS the proper procedure to follow to inform readers of the
group in question, while the second one implies that it is not.
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------
If you know the alphabet up to 'k', you can teach it up to 'k'.
Kenneth Arromdee
BITNET: G46I4701 at JHUVM and INS_AKAA at JHUVMS
CSNET: ins_akaa@jhunix.CSNET
ARPA: ins_akaa%jhunix@hopkins.ARPA
UUCP: ...{decvax,ihnp4,allegra}!seismo!umcp-cs!aplvax!aplcen!jhunix!ins_akaa