kimcm@diku.UUCP (Kim Christian Madsen) (07/21/85)
I know this is a little out of the original discussion, but I think the right solution must be to redefine the ASCII-Alphabet or making a new character-standard. Thus allowing *ALL* characters used in countries using latin letters. The convention could be that the special letters might be integrated in the existing alphabet - Thus (icelandic) "d" (-d) is placed before "e" and after "d". If such a standard could be made and be accepted then we would all have the special characters to play with. And not be satisfied with having only ae /o oa or { | } but not both.... -- Kim Chr. Madsen Datalogisk Institut (Institute of CS) University of Copenhagen {decvax,philabs,seismo}!mcvax!kimcm@diku.UUCP
keld@diku.UUCP (Keld J|rn Simonsen) (07/21/85)
There are such new ISO standards where all characters in the 8 bit set are defined (almost, I think there are 2 left positions in there). The scheme is that the lowest 128 positions are equivalent to ISO 646 international reference version and the upper part corre- sponding to the *letters* in the lower part, are also letters. And there is a correspondance between these letters in lower case and in upper case like in the 7-bit part. You can exchange positions in the 7-bit part with positions in the 8-bit part so for instance you can have an AE in the right place (according to the Danish Standard DS 2089). Thus you have backwards compatibility with ISO 646. I cannot give you the ISO numbers right now, but I have them somewhere. There is both a Western European version and an Eastern European version. But as Kim says, this has nothing to do with the troff special char discussion I raised. It can of cause be combined at some stage, but not at the immediate level. Troff is still 7-bit, like the rest of the world.