reid@glacier.ARPA (Brian Reid) (12/15/85)
In this argument I claim these things: (1) Troff is the most powerful formatting language, because it is the only one of the three mentioned that can compute generalized functions of the image state. Neither TeX nor Scribe can examine the image state. (2) I can't offhand see why that is a big deal. (3) I consider that the very best feature of Scribe is that nobody is able to make it process TeX-like input. The whole point of Scribe is that it enforces a certain amount of rigor and discipline on the preparation of documents. If I had wanted to program a turing-complete system that could emulate somebody else's formatter, I would have done so. (4) Arguments that the ugliness of published documents are not the fault of the text formatter are somewhat analogous to arguments that handguns don't kill people, rather people kill people. My stand on text formatters is the same as my stand on handguns: I don't want the average guy in the street to be carrying a gun, and I don't want the average hack at a word processing terminal to be using a text formatter that will let him have any control whatsoever over the appearance of the finished document. Stanley Morison, the eminent British typographer and Cambridge University Press author, wrote that the purpose of typesetting is to be invisible, and that if the reader even notices the typesetting of a book then the typesetting has failed. Most modern psychology researchers who have studied legibility of typewritten material (Burt [1959], Tinker [1963], Zachrisson [1965]) report that people find most legible that with which they are most familiar. Everyone finds his own newspaper to be much more readable than the New York Times (unless his own newspaper IS the NYT). Everyone finds his own handwriting legible. Everyone learns to like the fonts on his own laser printer. This suggests that we should all just pick some standard, however ugly, and all use it, because if we all use it then we will all be able to read each other's material more easily. Anyone game? -- Brian Reid decwrl!glacier!reid Stanford reid@SU-Glacier.ARPA
nather@utastro.UUCP (Ed Nather) (12/16/85)
In article <2455@glacier.ARPA>, reid@glacier.ARPA (Brian Reid) writes: > [...] I don't want the average hack at a > word processing terminal to be using a text formatter that will let him > have any control whatsoever over the appearance of the finished document. > Thank you, Brian. You have put our basic difference of opinion very clearly, far more clearly than I could ever have done. I'm not sure I qualify as "...the average hack at a word processing terminal ..." but I certainly *do* want to have control over the appearance of my finished document, which you have very successfully prevented me from doing with Scribe. That's why I will never use it again. -- Ed Nather Astronomy Dept, U of Texas @ Austin {allegra,ihnp4}!{noao,ut-sally}!utastro!nather nather@astro.UTEXAS.EDU