[net.micro.cbm] "@0:" vs "@:"

wanttaja@ssc-vax.UUCP (Ronald J Wanttaja) (06/12/84)

<  ** COMMODORE BASIC V2.0 **>
       38911 BYTES FREE

Regarding the use of "@0:" vs. "@:" for the save and replace function,
I used the "@0:" method for almost a year before I had a directory
trashed.  I rarely use seqential or other types of files other than
PRG, so that might have something to do with it, too.  Incidentally,
that first directory trash only occured AFTER Compute had a short 
blurb on it... makes ya wonder, doesn't it....?

			    Ron Wanttaja
			    (ssc-vax!wanttaja)