[net.micro.cbm] C compiler

stu@allegra.UUCP (Stu Brown) (02/03/84)

I called Manx two months ago about their C compiler
and they told me they were still working on it. Does
this mean two months more?

jmg@cernvax.UUCP (jmg) (03/04/85)

Now that Abacus have announced their C compiler for the 64 I wake up a bit.
However, since it is expensive ($80 plus postage), especially for us over in
the old continent (remember the $ is so high that it looks like part of the
satellite defence system!), I want to know what I would get.
Questions, therefore:

1. Is it a true compiler, or simply (as many Pascal "compilers") a translator
   from some intermediate object?
2. Are there any practical restrictions (e.g. using the limited 64 stack)?
3. Any benchmarks, e.g. for sieve of Erastosthenes?
4. Any competitor products?

I would be happy to see answers via net.micro.cbm (plus, of course, answers
to the questions that I should have asked but didn't).

		  Mike Gerard, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland

green@bambi.UUCP (Dan Green) (10/29/85)

Does anyone have benchmarks for any C compilers?
Things of intrest to me are:
1   Speed of compiled program
2   Available documentation
3   Ease of use (error messages, edditor commands)
4   Completeness of library functions

These benchmarks should be of general intrest so you can post them
to the net.