[net.micro.cpm] Questions on CP/M Plus

CSTROM@simtel20.ARPA (09/27/84)

I have heard that the Radio Shack implementation of CP/M Plus is a
real nightmare. It seems that Radio Shack contracted with DRI to write
Plus for the Mod 4, and that we are now seeing the old finger pointing
game - DRI says Radio Shack screwed up on the specs., and Radio Shack
says DRI blew the implementation!
Check out Montezuma Micro's Plus for the Mod 4 - I have heard it works
much better.

(Note the above is heresay garnered from listening into the
conversations of many Model 4 owners on CP-MIG on Compuserve.)

towson@Amsaa.ARPA (09/27/84)

From:      David Towson (SECAD) <towson@Amsaa.ARPA>

Charlie - Something sounds fishy about that TRS/DRI finger-pointing story.
If Tandy contracted with DRI to write CP/M+ for the Model 4, and didn't
provide DRI with a bunch of Model 4's to try it out on (with a contractual
obligation to do so), it's truly amazing.  But then, Radio Shack has certainly
done some spectacularly stupid things - like trying to make the Model-I a
closed system while Apple was doing just the opposite with their Apple-II.
I doubt whether RS will ever recover from that blunder.


Dave
towson@amsaa.arpa