[net.micro.cpm] EMACS for CP/M, MINCE, and SCRIBBLE

maxwell@babel.DEC (05/30/85)

I've gotten  awfully  used to using EMACS (on VAX/VMS) here at work. So used
to  it,  in  fact,  that I've looked into EMACS-like editors for CP/M-80, so
that I can feel [nearly] as comfortable at home too.

I've got  copies of several articles/reviews on MINCE (MINCE Is Not Complete
EMACS), which  paint  a  rather nice picture of an editor more like what I'd
like  to  have.  MINCE is also usually described in concert with SCRIBBLE, a
text processor which also sounds desirable.

Recently however,  I  called  Mark of the Unicorn to learn about pricing and
availability,  and learned that they're no longer supporting either MINCE or
SCRIBBLE,   but   refered  me  to  their  two  distributors.  One  of  their
distributors  didn't  think  that  MINCE  ran  on  CP/M-80,  and didn't have
SCRIBBLE. Neither of the distributors were really sure that the C source for
the  MINCE  commands  (available to allow user customizing) was available as
part of the package, as it has been in the past.  Well informed folks.

Mark of  the  Unicorn's  FINAL  WORD doesn't run on CP/M-80 as I recall, and
from  the reviews it seems to have changed enough from MINCE+SCRIBBLE that I
don't think it's what I want.

Which leads me to my questions.

Is there  anyone out there who uses MINCE (and SCRIBBLE), and who might have
comments about either? What's performance like? Where, and how long ago, did
you get  it/them?  How difficult is MINCE to customize? How much of EMACS is
left  out?  Any  word on whether or not, if Mark of the Unicorn is no longer
supporting  MINCE  or  SCRIBBLE (since they're pushing FINAL WORD, now), the
sources to MINCE and SCRIBBLE might be available?

I've already started, but if I can get away with not writing my own....

-+- Sid Maxwell, DEC @ Spit Brook, Nashua NH

BHUBER@USC-ECL.ARPA (05/31/85)

In response to your message sent  30 May 85 15:34:45 GMT

Contrary to your comment about the MotU's Final Word, it DOES run on CP/M-80
systems.  I have a copy and use it on an Apple //e with the Premium Softcard.
Granted, I don't use it very often, but it does work.  The reason I got it
was it was the only package with support for "true" proportional spacing on
a Diablo 1650 printer.  I now use WordStar and do the final printing with a
fantastic package called MagicBind/MagicIndex.

Cheers,
Bud Huber
-------

young@uci-icsc.ARPA (Michal Young) (06/01/85)

Mince and Scribble for CP/M-80 live on as Perfect Writer and Perfect
Formatter (respectively), and used to come standard with Kaypros.  I don't
know if Kaypro still furnishes the (im)Perfect family.   Unfortunately, 
source is not available for the Perfect versions.  You can do some 
limited customization by rebinding keys and telling it a bit about your 
printer (but you can't get superscripts and subscripts unless your printer
is one of the `supported' models-- no way to write your own driver for 
others).  

--Michal Young
  young@uci.arpa

tsc2597@acf4.UUCP (Sam Chin) (06/01/85)

<>

The Final Word certainly does run on CPM/80. About 2 years ago I used Final
Word to create a manual for a product. It was running on TurboDOS with slave
Z-80 boards. There are several differences between it an the 16 bit version
but it is definately the best program on CPM/80 to generate a manual. It
worked flawlessly with a Qume printer and proportional spacing.

Sam Chin
allegra!cmcl2!acf4!tsc2597
tsc2597.acf4@nyu

cem@intelca.UUCP (Chuck McManis) (06/03/85)

> 
> Mince and Scribble for CP/M-80 live on as Perfect Writer and Perfect
> Formatter (respectively), and used to come standard with Kaypros.  I don't
> know if Kaypro still furnishes the (im)Perfect family.   Unfortunately, 
> source is not available for the Perfect versions.  You can do some 
> limited customization by rebinding keys and telling it a bit about your 
> printer (but you can't get superscripts and subscripts unless your printer
> is one of the `supported' models-- no way to write your own driver for 
> others).  
> 
> --Michal Young
>   young@uci.arpa

However, Mince could handle files larger than 64K wheras Perfect Writer
didn't seem to. Even with a huge >128K swap file. It is/was quite a shame
for MotU to drop Mince/Scribble support like it did. Now if they would
just release the source to the public domain...

--Chuck
-- 
                                            - - - D I S C L A I M E R - - - 
{ihnp4,fortune}!dual\                     All opinions expressed herein are my
        {qantel,idi}-> !intelca!cem       own and not those of my employer, my
 {ucbvax,hao}!hplabs/                     friends, or my avocado plant. :-}

oacb2@ut-ngp.UUCP (oacb2) (06/04/85)

> However, Mince could handle files larger than 64K wheras Perfect Writer
> didn't seem to. Even with a huge >128K swap file.

I often use Perfect Writer with files larger than 64K.  I think the largest
I've ever edited with it is about 180K.  I use a 248K swap file.
-- 

	Mike Rubenstein, OACB, UT Medical Branch, Galveston TX 77550