[net.micro.cpm] ** Ramdisk Information **

walt_sak@proper.UUCP (Walt Sakai) (07/26/85)

I   would  like  to  invite  comment  on  the  RAMDISKS  used  in 
conjunction with CP/M systems.     Please discuss the  advantages 
and  bugs  you  have found for your  system.     Currently  I  am 
interested in using MICROSHERE's Ramdisk with a Kaypro 4-84.   

Is  the  cost  of the ramdisk worthy of the  increased  speed  in 
program  execution?     Does the ramdisk make working  with  very 
large  dBase  II files faster?     What are typical time  savings 
(relative to processor speed)?

Thanks  very  much  for your attention  in  this  matter.     All 
replies will be summarized and posted to this net group.

Walt Sakai  
{ucbvax,hplabs,ihnp4,cbosgd,
 decwrl,unisoft,fortune,sun,nsc}!dual!proper!walt_sak      

hollombe@ttidcc.UUCP (The Polymath) (07/31/85)

In article <164@proper.UUCP> walt_sak@proper.UUCP (walt_sak) writes:
>
>I   would  like  to  invite  comment  on  the  RAMDISKS  used  in 
>conjunction with CP/M systems.     Please discuss the  advantages 
>and  bugs  you  have found for your  system.     Currently  I  am 
>interested in using MICROSHERE's Ramdisk with a Kaypro 4-84.   

I'm currently using the 360K version of Westwind's Drive C on my Osborne 1.
It  works  as  advertised  and  enormously  speeds up any program that does
overlay swapping from disk (Wordstar is vastly  improved).  It  also  comes
with  a  version  of  Supercalc  2  that uses the RAMDisk for virtual core,
allowing truly enormous spreadsheets.  I haven't had time to test this yet.
I  haven't  encountered any bugs as yet, nor heard of any from anyone else.
It does take about a minute to load from floppies when booting,  but  all's
clear  sailing  from  there.  The drive includes software that allows it to
act as a print buffer and RAMDisk simultaneously.

>Is  the  cost  of the ramdisk worthy of the  increased  speed  in 
>program  execution?     Does the ramdisk make working  with  very 
>large  dBase  II files faster?     What are typical time  savings 
>(relative to processor speed)?

Drive C costs about $650 in the 360K version.  I thought it was  worth  it,
others may not.  I haven't tried it with dBase II yet, but did use dBase II
with a RAMDisk on an IBM PC.  It makes an enormous difference in speed  (at
least  10x)  over  floppy disk operation.  On the other hand, no difference
was detectable over hard disk operation.

-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
The Polymath (aka: Jerry Hollombe)
Citicorp TTI                      Common Sense is what tells you that a ten
3100 Ocean Park Blvd.             pound weight falls ten times as fast as a
Santa Monica, CA  90405           one pound weight.
(213) 450-9111, ext. 2483
{philabs,randvax,trwrb,vortex}!ttidca!ttidcc!hollombe

droms@purdue.edu (Ralph E Droms) (07/31/85)

Micro-Cornucopia magazine recently reviewed a number of Z80 SBC memory
expansion boards.  Micro-C no. 22 (February-March, 1985) includes
reviews of a 256K RAM Expansion Module from Ferguson Engineering, and
the Rivendell Audiocomp 256K Ram + I/O expansion board.  Issue no. 23
(April-May, 1985) has a short review of the MicroSphere 256K RAMdisk.
Issue no. 9 (Dec. 1982) reviews the LASoftware 256K RAMDisk kit.

					- Ralph

-------------------------
Ralph Droms					ihnp4!purdue!droms
445 MATH					droms@purdue.arpa
Dept. of Computer Science			droms@purdue.csnet
Purdue University
West Lafayette, IN 47907

----------