kvancamp@PICA-LCA.ARPA (LCWSL) (10/11/85)
I disagree with Dick Stanley on writing 48 tpi disks on 96 tpi drives. I've been reading & writing this way on my IBM PC AT for quite a while with no complications (DOS 2.10). --Ken Van Camp
STANLEY@USC-ECLB.ARPA (10/11/85)
Received: from PICA-LCA.ARPA by USC-ECLB.ARPA; Fri 11 Oct 85 04:56:14-PDT Date: Fri, 11 Oct 85 7:48:36 EDT From: Kenneth E. Van_Camp (LCWSL) <kvancamp@Pica-Lca.ARPA> To: stanley@usc-eclb.arpa Cc: info-cpm@amsaa.arpa Subject: read/write 48 tpi disks on 96 tpi drives Return-Path: <kvancamp@Pica-Lca> I disagree with Dick Stanley on writing 48 tpi disks on 96 tpi drives. I've been reading & writing this way on my IBM PC AT for quite a while with no complications (DOS 2.10). --Ken Van Camp -------------------- Ken, I'm glad to know it can be done with repeatability. Any hints you can offer on how to get the write part to work dependably will be greatly appreciated. My H89 won't do that at all, and out PC/AT at the office bats no better than .400. ...Dick
edelheit@MITRE.ARPA (Jeff Edelheit) (10/11/85)
For what it's worth, we were so concerned about read/write of 48 tpi on our PC/AT we spent the extra $200+ and got the optional 48 tpi second drive. Dick, one thing to note in Ken's earlier note was that he said he used 2.1 not 3.1. If the 2.1 is a typo, then he is having much better luck than anyonelse I know. Jeff Edelheit (edelheit@mitre)