kvancamp@PICA-LCA.ARPA (LCWSL) (10/11/85)
I disagree with Dick Stanley on writing 48 tpi disks on 96 tpi drives. I've been reading & writing this way on my IBM PC AT for quite a while with no complications (DOS 2.10). --Ken Van Camp
STANLEY@USC-ECLB.ARPA (10/11/85)
Received: from PICA-LCA.ARPA by USC-ECLB.ARPA; Fri 11 Oct 85 04:56:14-PDT
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 85 7:48:36 EDT
From: Kenneth E. Van_Camp (LCWSL) <kvancamp@Pica-Lca.ARPA>
To: stanley@usc-eclb.arpa
Cc: info-cpm@amsaa.arpa
Subject: read/write 48 tpi disks on 96 tpi drives
Return-Path: <kvancamp@Pica-Lca>
I disagree with Dick Stanley on writing 48 tpi disks on 96 tpi drives.
I've been reading & writing this way on my IBM PC AT for quite a while
with no complications (DOS 2.10).
--Ken Van Camp
--------------------
Ken,
I'm glad to know it can be done with repeatability. Any hints
you can offer on how to get the write part to work dependably
will be greatly appreciated. My H89 won't do that at all, and
out PC/AT at the office bats no better than .400.
...Dickedelheit@MITRE.ARPA (Jeff Edelheit) (10/11/85)
For what it's worth, we were so concerned about read/write of 48 tpi on our PC/AT we spent the extra $200+ and got the optional 48 tpi second drive. Dick, one thing to note in Ken's earlier note was that he said he used 2.1 not 3.1. If the 2.1 is a typo, then he is having much better luck than anyonelse I know. Jeff Edelheit (edelheit@mitre)