[net.comics] Comments on Marvel-related stuff

hutch@shark.UUCP (Stephen Hutchison) (01/18/84)

Gad.  I can't help it anymore, I have to throw in my two bits worth.

Regards Secret Bores:
	According to my pusher (oops, I meant comics dealer) the whole
	thing behind Secret Wars is that Cadence, who own Marvel, are
	pushing on Marvel to regain the "kiddie/supermarket" sales
	which they believe to be the majority of their market potential.
	The method which they are using is to come out with a line of
	downscale comics, written at what they fondly imagine is the
	intellectual level of the audience.  There is no evidence yet
	that they plan to create a less expensive product but everything
	leads to the conclusion that they plan on a CHEAPER one.

	Simultaneously they are going after the Collectors market by
	publishing the Baxter-format, direct-sales, and the limited
	series stuff.  They even announce these strategies to the
	dealers in order to minimize hassles.
	They FORGOT to announce that Secret Wars, which is required
	reading for anyone who wants to keep track of the consistency
	of the Marvel Sloppiverse, is IN THE KIDDIE SALES BRACKET.

	This is shown by the simplified characterisations, where all
	the players have to act within the minimal set of character
	traits described in the on-file profiles.

	Therefore, Dr. Octopus is seen to pick a fight with Creel,
	who responds with the classic line, "Shuddup, or I, Crusher
	Creel, the Absorbin' Man, will ..."

	This is partly because Shooter still writes the same way he
	did when he was a 14 year old boy writing for the Legion of
	Super Heroes, and partly because his own editorial policy
	demands that all the Kiddie Line have enough expository
	stuff in them that the Kiddies aren't left confused.

	Shooter could have used an editor.  But who could edit the
	work of the Editor-in-Chief?

Regarding John Byrne:
	My opinion of the hack has been published before, but it
	changes every time I see his work.

	First, I enjoy his style, WHEN HE TAKES TIME TO DO GOOD WORK.
	Otherwise he sucks worse than bad Kirby or Ditko, and when
	he is being sloppy, Herb Trimpe or Don Heck could outshine
	him.

	His writing can be nice, and often has incredibly complex or
	subtle things to say.  This is because he is a shameless
	plagiarist with a convenient memory.  When he is cadging
	from another writer, or doing a remake of another storyline,
	his work is somewhat better than when he does his "original"
	work, where he is forced to rely on the Claremont style of
	overemoting to support his lackluster ideas.

	Another gripe I have is with his treatment of the Fantastic
	Four.  Not bad enough that he reverted the Thing, and was
	rewarded by sales drops so severe that he had to fix it,
	but he has reverted Johnny Storm from an athletic, trained,
	and well-built 24 year old to a skinny, gawky 16 year old
	who looks terminally underfed.  Feh!

	Alpha Blight -er, Flight, has proven itself a nonentity.
	The ideas are at least unfamiliar, except that he makes it
	clear that the Monsters of the North are all ripoffs from
	another company; some of the characterisation is nice, and
	he deserves some kudoes for Puck, but the RESEARCH for the
	important characters is real shoddy.  The Jean-Marie/Aurora
	personality split doesn't begin to follow the actual case
	pathologies of known multiple personality cases.  Further,
	his paranoid fears of organized Christianity have rendered
	otherwise interesting situations totally unbelievable.
	The "last-of-its-kind" Catholic school, where the Nuns are
	sadists from the Dark ages, is straight out of a Stephen
	King novella, and have about that much basis in reality.
	All this aside, the thing is just NOT INTERESTING.


This has already gone on too long, folks.
Rather than starting to sound like the Comics Journal, a rag if ever I
saw one, I will conclude this article and go put on my asbestos poncho.

Hutch