[net.comics] Who knows what evil Jayembee Reviews lurk in the hearts of men?

boyajian@akov68.DEC (JERRY BOYAJIAN) (03/15/86)

Reviewed this time around:

BATMAN: THE DARK KNIGHT RETURNS [BOOK ONE]
THE SHADOW #1-2

Ratings for the comics reviewed are as according to the new, improved, lemon-
freshened Mad Armenian Scale.

"For a critic, it's better to have wrong standards than none at all."

						-- Elmer Allyn Craft

********************************************************************************
|>A< Nirvana. As R. Fiore (COMICS JOURNAL) would say, "Don't hold your breath."|
|>B< Sex is still #1, but sliced bread is definitely in trouble.               |
|>C< Now, *that's* entertainment!                                              |
|>D< Better than being poked in the eye with a sharp stick.                    |
|>F< Please pass the sharp stick.                                              |
|>Z< Better dead than read.                                                    |
********************************************************************************

Before I get into the actual reviews, I want to deliver an editorial of
sorts. The particular comics I'm looking at this time are among those that
try a reviewer's soul. Here we have two comics that have been eagerly antic-
ipated by many comics fans for quite some time, comics that have been hyped
here and there throughout the comics press. When faced with this sort of
comic, it's easy to give a glowing review, but one always has a nagging doubt
somewhere in the back of the mind. "If I like it," the little voice asks, "Is
it because it's *really* good, or because I'm just seeing the Emperor's new
clothes along with everyone else? Or have I somehow *convinced* myself that
I like it because I don't want to look foolish? Or yet worse, have I decided
subconsciously that, dammit, I'm going to like this if it kills me?"
	All I can do is attempt to be honest with myself. I do know that on
occasion, I find myself writing something different than what I intended to
write. Often, writing these reviews is an educational look at myself.

Now, on with the show---


BATMAN: THE DARK KNIGHT RETURNS [BOOK ONE]   [DC, mini-series, $2.95]   A-

	As is evident from previous reviews of mine, it is my considered
opinion that Alan Moore sits at the Right Hand of God. I will have to add to
that by saying that Frank Miller sits at the Left Hand of God. Years back,
Miller took the comic world by storm as he transformed DAREDEVIL into the
best book in the Marvel corner (and one of the best comics of the time,
period). Unfortunately, he slipped from grace in the eyes of comics fandom
when he tried a more experimental style for RONIN, which to my mind was a
vastly underrated book. Somehow, though, he's managed to maintain some of
his reputation, as rumors of his projects-in-the-works continues to elicit
excitement.
	Once again, Miller took DAREDEVIL from the depths to which it slid
and made it into a jaw-dropper of a book. It's a rare comic about which I
have caught myself thinking, "This is probably even better than SWAMP
THING at the moment!" And to further prove that Miller walks with the gods,
he gives us THE DARK KNIGHT RETURNS. From the silhouette of Batman against
a lightning bolt on the front cover through the last page, I was virtually
struck dumb. Miller's storytelling sense is in full form here. He makes
the rather trite gimmick of tv news broadcasts to explicate matters feels
fresh. As does the also rather trite use of a major thunderstorm to add to
the menacing atmosphere. Even the somewhat overused cinematic flashback of
young Bruce seeing his parents killed still works well.
	What struck me most about this comic was the feeling I had inside
about it, a feeling that reminded me of seeing SUPERMAN--THE MOVIE for the
first time. The sequences of Batman appearing here and there throughout
Gotham dropping criminals in their tracks like a one man crimefighting
blitz, stunning citizens in the bargain, was just a darker version of
Superman's first night from the movie. And it elicited that same sense of
excitement as the Superman movie did in that respect. It's interesting to
note that Batman as such doesn't really show up in full figure until page
26, and by that we are primed for it. Miller milks it for all it's worth.
He had me in his pocket the whole time, and I enjoyed every minute of it.
	Since others have brought this up, I suppose I should say something
about Miller's using the name "Mutants" for the gang that's terrorizing
Gotham. I suspect that it's Miller having a very subtle laugh at Marvel's
"overuse" of mutants these days.
	Right now, I will unequivocally say that this is *the* best Batman
story I have ever seen, topping even that set of Englehart/Rogers/Austin
stories recently reprinted in SHADOW OF THE BATMAN. If the other three
issues are as good as this one, I've no doubt what I'm going to vote for
next year as best comic of this year. It's easily worth the $2.95 cover
price.


THE SHADOW #1-2		[DC, mini-series, $1.50]	#1 - B  #2 - C+

	Aside from the problems mentioned above, there's another couple
of problems in dealing with this comic. First, it's hard not to compare
it to the original pulp series. Secondly, it's hard not to compare it to
the DC SHADOW comic of the early 1970's. Unfortunately, Chaykin's SHADOW
doesn't quite measure up.
	The pulp character was dark, moody, and mysterious, featured in
stories that fairly dripped with menace. DC's earlier comic series did
quite a good job of capturing this atmosphere, mostly due to Mike Kaluta's
outstanding artwork on the first half-dozen issues. And even while I had
some quibbles with O'Neil's scripts, his stories had the right Shadowy
feel to them.
	Chaykin gives us a violent, gritty, hardboiled crime comic. It's
a marvelous piece of work, but it just ain't the Shadow. Well, not quite.
What we have here seems to owe more to Chaykin's 1975 Atlas Comics homage
to the Shadow -- the Scorpion (and to *that* character's literary descen-
dent Dominic Fortune, which Chaykin did for Marvel) -- than it does to the
original Weird Avenger of Crime. This is especially true with the second
issue, in which Chaykin describes an "origin" to the Shadow that goes off
in a totally separate direction from anything in the pulp series, and even
violates certain "facts" related in the pulps.
	Still, the comic is terrific, well worth your time and money.
Just don't expect the *real* Shadow.

--- jayembee (Jerry Boyajian, DEC, Acton-Nagog, MA)

UUCP:	{decvax|ihnp4|allegra|ucbvax|...}
	!decwrl!dec-rhea!dec-akov68!boyajian
ARPA:	boyajian%akov68.DEC@DECWRL.DEC.COM