[net.bicycle] Colman McCarthy's Washington Post article

dsn@umcp-cs.UUCP (11/04/83)

The following article by Colman McCarthy, entitled ``Beware the Lawless
Bicyclist,'' appeared on the editorial page of the Washington Post on
Saturday, Oct.  29:

    In 1973, when I and a large number of others responded to the
    then-dawning energy crisis by getting rid of our cars and commuting
    to work by bicycle, we were praised by others and congratulated by
    ourselves.  Ten years later, cyclists have blown it.
    
    Too many of us ride recklessly.  We break traffic laws as if we
    have a permanent right-of-way.  We injure or scare pedestrians,
    cause accidents with motorists, and maim or kill ourselves.  With
    good reason, we are seen as roadway terrors.  William Saroyan
    believed that ``the bicycle is the noblest invention of mankind,''
    to which it now must be added that Americans in 1983 are the most
    ignoble users.
    
    I have only a few statistics and 10 years of surviving the odds of
    50 pedaled miles a week, but I can say that what I fear the most on
    the road are not cars, taxis, buses or trucks but other cyclists.
    We are dangerous because we are unpredictable.  We share the road
    with other vehicles, but sharing the rules of the road is often
    something else.
    
    The data suggest we are not the civic-minded, virtuous underdogs up
    against The Killer Car.  IN 1981 in Washington, a year in which the
    547 reported accidents involving bicycles represented a 10 percent
    increase over 1980, cyclists were at fault in 49 percent of the
    accidents and motorists in 35 percent.
    
    What the police state is what everyone can see in open daylight:
    cyclist lawlessness is rampant.  Twice as many of Washington's
    accidents in 1981 due to running lights or stop signs were caused
    by cyclists.  In the traffic anarchy of New York City, 461
    pedestrians were injured by cyclists in 1981.
    
    Before the mid-1970s rise in recreational, commuting and
    courier-service bicycling, children were the major accident victims.
    Washington's 1981 figures show a change.  The age group 10 to 19 was
    involved in 40 percent of the accidents, while those from 20 to 34
    accounted for 41 percent.
    
    The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety reports that this is a
    national trend.  The greatest increase in cyclist death rates was
    in the 25- to 34-year-old age group.  In 1980, nearly 1,000
    cyclists were killed in accidents.
    
    With the death rate rising and an increase in lawlessness visible
    in the streets of any American city, cyclists show a rank disregard
    for even their own safety.  ``Few bicyclists wear helmets,'' the
    Institute reports in its forthcoming ``Injury Fact Book.''  A
    ``review of bicyclist deaths in Dade County, Fla., indicated that
    the head or neck is the most seriously injured part of the body in
    five of six fatally injured cyclists.''
    
    What kind of lasso should be tightened around the necks of these
    street cowboys?  First it needs to be said that a fair portion of
    cyclists obey the law.  For me, next to my helmet and my prayers to
    St.  Christopher, the law is my surest protection.  I keep it, it
    keeps me.  In addition, all of us cyclists have tales of taking
    motorist abuse.  This ranges from deliberate sideswipes that send
    us flying, to foul language, which is a severe problem for women
    cyclists.
    
    Three initial reforms are obvious:  mandatory helmet laws,
    licensing of cyclists after age 16 and more safety courses in
    elementary and junior high schools.
    
    I am uncomfortable criticizing cyclists, being one myself and
    knowing that many of the Earth's freest spirits are fellow
    two-wheeled travelers.  For years, we thought that motorists were
    our natural enemies.  Us Against Them.  Now we know better.  We've
    become as frightening as we always believed motorists to be.  It's
    Us Against Us.
    
    The statistics showing we are accident causers more than accident
    victims, and that we ride helmetless, can't be ignored.  Nor is
    there much to the argument that motorists do their share of
    lawbreaking, so why pick on cyclists?
    
    Bicycling need not turn nasty.  The simplicity of the machine, the
    healthiness of the exercise, the freedom from the car addiction:
    these peaceful joys shouldn't be squandered in the ugly street wars
    that more and more cyclists seem to relish.  In 1973, we were above
    the battle.  We should get back there again.
-- 
Dana S. Nau
...!seismo!umcp-cs!dsn (Usenet)
dsn.umcp-cs@udel-relay (Arpanet)