daver@felix.UUCP (Dave Richards) (03/14/86)
****************************************** I have been browsing through this newsgroup for a while now and haven't seen anything on these bikes. The arguments for the design *seem* logical, ie.: Lower center of gravity increases stability, less wind resistance, more effective use of leg leverage, more comfortable seat possible, and better interaction with auto drivers because of mutual vision contact. Since reading about recumbents about 4 years ago, I've always thought that if I were to buy another bike it would be one of them. Does anyone have any comments about them, pro or con? Post to the net or E-mail, as you see fit. Dave "The Reclusive Recliner" Richards
greg@utcsri.UUCP (Gregory Smith) (03/16/86)
In article <964@felix.UUCP> daver@felix.UUCP (Dave Richards) writes: >I have been browsing through this newsgroup for a while now and haven't >seen anything on these bikes. The arguments for the design *seem* >logical, ie.: Lower center of gravity increases stability, less wind >resistance, more effective use of leg leverage, more comfortable seat >possible, and better interaction with auto drivers because of mutual >vision contact. > >Dave "The Reclusive Recliner" Richards I will first mention that I have never ridden one of these (or even seen one in the flesh ) so take this with a grain of salt. I don't believe that a lower C. of G. increases stability. Remember we are talking about _dynamic_ balance here. The higher you are above the ground, the more slowly you fall over, and the easier it is to correct. If you don't believe this, put a pop bottle over the end of a 2ft long stick, and try balancing it vertically with the other end on your hand. Then try it with a 6ft long stick (the stick should still be lighter than the bottle). The longer stick makes it much easier. And when you balance a bike, you do it by moving the _bottom_ end back and forth ( via the front wheel) so it is more or less the same thing (even with hands off the bar. Flame away). You would, however, be less affected by crosswinds. The argument for less wind resistance would seem to make sense. I don't think you would have better vision contact with anybody driving anything but a Morris Mini. Riding one of these past a large truck, van, or pickup must be positively nerve-wracking. As to the better riding position and use of leg energy, I would really like to try one of these out one day ( despite the above points ) and find out. I suspect that if they were as good as they say, though, we would be seeing more around [ narrow-minded biased thinking :-) :-) ]. -- "No eternal reward will forgive us now for wasting the dawn" -J. Morrison ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Greg Smith University of Toronto ..!decvax!utzoo!utcsri!greg