jk@utastro.UUCP (John Krist) (12/10/85)
Ok, you 68k'ers have got my goat, and I've grown tired of getting mail which reads just like a Motorola ad. I've been told some of the strangest stuff, and when I got mail from someone at Motorola saying that the 32032 shouldn't be called a real 32 bitter because it doesn't have a 32 bit address path, I said "Enough!" . I had to put up with magazine articles a so by Motorolers that the 68000 should be considered a 32 bitter. Some of the mail has been crude, implying that I don't know anything about the subject, and that those who don't love Motorola and its offspring are also lacking intelligence in this area. I called for flames, but not for mail that says "be quiet, listen to me, I will tell you what is right." I'm sorry, but I expected a good discussion about the pro's and con's of the 32032 compared with the 68020 and 80386, not " the 68020 is the word of God " stuff. The people over in net.micro.68k haven't included us in their comparisons, so I just though that maybe we could. I didn't know that .16k was created so that 68k'ers could make fun of NSC. Send me no more mail about this, for I see no reason why I have to read mail that insults rather than informs. Unless you have a question about the DSI-32 board, please leave me alone. I will try to answer questions I received before the week is up, and I will post the Dhrystone results when I get them. But I have had enough, and I'm going to stay quiet. Expecting better, John Krist U. Texas Astronomy Dept. (jk@utastro.UUCP)