phillips@reed.UUCP (Patrick Phillips) (12/06/85)
In article <4468@apple.UUCP> mark@apple.UUCP (Mark Lentczner) writes: >[] >Being a member of the Smalltalk group at Apple, I was very pleased >to see the review of our current release of Smalltalk for the Macintosh. >I need to correct two things with the review however. > > 2) The reviewer only had a 512k machine and hence only used level 0 > of the release. Level 1, which requires 1 Meg or more, is the ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Let's see, if Apple is developing a product to run on a 1 Meg machine, they must be prepared to produce a 1 Meg machine. Perhaps this lends more than rumor to the rumors. Patrick Phillips (phillips@reed)
breuel@h-sc1.UUCP (thomas breuel) (12/07/85)
> > 2) The reviewer only had a 512k machine and hence only used level 0 > > of the release. Level 1, which requires 1 Meg or more, is the > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > Let's see, if Apple is developing a product to run on a 1 Meg > machine, they must be prepared to produce a 1 Meg machine. Perhaps > this lends more than rumor to the rumors. Please don't start rumours here. Apple already *has* a 1Meg machine. It is called the Mac XL. You can even upgrade it to 2Meg. Thomas.