[can.politics] Hidden cost

gdvsmit@watrose.UUCP (Riel Smit) (07/22/86)

A comment by a representative of one of the so-called frontline
states (he was testifying before the Commons Committee on Human
Rights(?)) made me think of this for the first time.  

He said: "We know sanctions will hurt us, but we don't mind" (or 
words to that effect).

The synic in me could not help but reply "I'm sure you don't care
because you'll just demand compensation from the 'rich' (western)
countries."

vassos@utcsri.UUCP (Vassos Hadzilacos) (07/22/86)

> A comment by a representative of one of the so-called frontline
> states (he was testifying before the Commons Committee on Human
> Rights(?)) made me think of this for the first time.  
> 
> He said: "We know sanctions will hurt us, but we don't mind" (or 
> words to that effect).
> 
> The synic in me could not help but reply "I'm sure you don't care
> because you'll just demand compensation from the 'rich' (western)
> countries."

According to the Globe and Mail, the man quoted above (from Zimbabwe,
if I recall correctly) proceeded to say that his country's position is
NOT contingent on compensation by other countries but that, of course,
any such assistance would be welcome. Moreover, he described the damage
of sanctions on the front-line states as "short term", in contrast to
the "long term" damage caused by apartheid.

In my opinion, helping eradicate apartheid is one of the best uses
financial assistance to other countries can find. Instead of financing
the Duarte regime in Salvador, we might as well help the front-line
states against South Africa's threat that it will pass on to them the
consequences of sanctions.

Vassos Hadzilacos.

gdvsmit@watrose.UUCP (Riel Smit) (07/23/86)

In article <3147@utcsri.UUCP> vassos@utcsri.UUCP (Vassos Hadzilacos) writes:
>                               we might as well help the front-line
>states against South Africa's threat that it will pass on to them the
>consequences of sanctions.

Do people really expect of South Africa (or any other nation, for that
matter) NOT to pass on the consequences of sanctions?  In politics
self-interest is unfortunately THE driving force.  I am afraid I don't 
think there is a nation on the face of this earth that would, if hurting 
as a result of sanctions by amongst others its neighbours, shield their 
neighbours from the hurt.  A threat?  I think it is more a natural 
consequence than anything else.