[net.books] Not more Rand

mike@hpfclk.UUCP (10/18/83)

#R:rdin:-32700:hpfclk:1800003:000:1863
hpfclk!mike    Oct 13 11:40:00 1983

  I too, have just finished reading The Fountainhead for the first time.
  I found the following themes recurring throughout the book which 
  of course, constitute the basic premises and attributes of 
  Objectivist Philosophy, and the highest values of Rand's archetypical 
  rational human being.  
  
	1)  Reason is the rational person's only tool of survival.
	
        2)  There is no such thing as a 'collective thought'.

	3)  Each person is free to do whatever he wishes so long
	    as he does not forcibly or detrimentally interfere with 
	    the lives of others.

        4)  If an agreement is made and one party fails to uphold its
	    part, then the other party has the right to revoke its own part.

        5)  Progress is the direct consequence of man's ego applied to
	    reality. 

        6)  A rational person does not seek the admiration of others
	    (e.g. He does not derive his self-respect from what other
	    people think of him; he is not a 'second-hander').

	7)  A rational person does not seek to restrain or rule other
	    individuals (no master/slave relationships are possible).
            The only relationship possible to the rational person is
	    a 'value for value' one.

        8)  A rational person does not live his life for others.
        
	9)  A rational person does not earn his existence by peddling
	    to human weaknesses or irrationalities. 
	    
       10)  A rational person will never compromise or sacrifice his values
	    (e.g. definition of integrity).

	
     I think Rand illuminated all of these points in the novel quite well.
     And although you say you're glad the the world isn't full of people
     holding Roark's values, I would sleep better at night if it was.
	
                                          Michael Bishop
					  Hewlett-Packard, FSD
					  hplabs!hpfcla!hpfclk!mike

laura@utcsstat.UUCP (Laura Creighton) (10/23/83)

The problem, though, is that "rational" never gets adequately defined. Whatever
I use to appreciate music and art and the taste of strawberries probably isn't
reason. And I refuse to live according to a moral standard that does not
include an appreciation for strawberries and whipped cream.

Laura Creighton
utcsstat!laura