[net.books] American interventions abroad: a review of Kwitny's ENDLESS ENEMIES

donn@utah-cs.UUCP (Donn Seeley) (09/30/84)

ENDLESS ENEMIES: THE MAKING OF AN UNFRIENDLY WORLD.  Jonathan Kwitny.
Congdon & Weed, 1984.

This book's real theme is stated on the front cover:  'How America's
worldwide interventions destroy democracy and free enterprise and
defeat our own best interests.' Kwitny's thesis is that American
intervention in the affairs of foreign countries has a long history of
backfiring, principally because American leaders have such a shallow
understanding of the forces at work in the countries involved.  He
believes that the Russians are no different from us in this respect,
and that more intelligent behavior on our part could result in a shift
away from the antagonism from Third World countries which has almost
become a cliche, and bring the US some respect.

This is the Ugly American theme again, but where Lederer and Burdick
were content to fictionalize and propagandize, Kwitny is determined to
be brutal with facts and accusations about real people and events.
Kwitny's greatest skill is his way of presenting the feelings of the
inhabitants of the countries he visits, and comparing them against the
alleged misinformation in the hands of our government and press.  This
is a wonderfully convincing technique and it makes 'fictionalization'
insipid by comparison.

Very early in the book Kwitny takes us to a meeting in New York City to
discuss the debt crisis in Zaire.  Representatives of all the biggest
banks are present, as well as representatives of the US government.
The government of Zaire reassures everyone that debt repayments will
proceed on schedule, and that the economy has regained some momentum so
that Zaire will continue to be a good credit risk.  Kwitny punctures
the complacency of this meeting by taking us to Zaire and showing us
the lives of some of its people and discussing its complicated tribal
politics.  Zaire is a bomb waiting to go off -- some time soon
'President' Mobutu will die or be assassinated, and chances are that we
will be confronted with one of the most radical states on the African
continent.  Mobutu keeps the country in a military and economic
stranglehold while he accumulates enough personal wealth to become one
of the richest people on this planet.  Much of the money is skimmed off
foreign aid and investment; the rest comes from government monopolies
on internal trade.  Kwitny makes an ironic contrast between Zaire and
the neighboring People's Republic of the Congo: ostensibly a member of
the 'free world', Zaire is objectively speaking as socialist as any
Eastern European country, while the ostensibly communist Congo is a
burgeoning free market -- a market founded on goods smuggled in from
controlled markets in Zaire.  Kwitny takes a mole's eye view of such
things as the recent currency devaluations instigated by the IMF.  The
government decreed that all money outside the central bank (a slush
fund for corrupt officials) would be invalidated in three days --
people could exchange up to $1000 worth of old money for new money at
central bank offices, and the rest was simply paper.  This destroyed
what small business there was (competition for the government and its
cronies) and straightforwardly cheated all the people who were unable
to penetrate the panic at the bank offices, or for that matter were
unable to get to a bank in time once they had heard the news.

How did things get to be such a mess?  It appears from interviews and
documents obtained under the Freedom of Information act that our
government, through the media of the Central Intelligence Agency and
the State Department, was directly responsible for ousting the existing
Zaire government in 1960 and installing Mobutu and friends.  I think
Kwitny tends to be a bit paranoid when discussing these things, but
some of the details uncovered by the congressional intelligence
committee are quite startling, such as the various proposals to murder
Patrice Lumumba using poisoned toothpaste and other silly things
(provincial Congolese don't use toothpaste anyway).  Why were we so
desperate to upset Lumumba?  Kwitny believes that the Lumumba regime
was not particularly competent and would have fallen for internal
reasons in a few years; now Lumumba is a household word across Africa,
a hero for having resisted American imperialism.  Think of all the
money we have spent on a country that very likely will become another
Iran, when we could have done differently and perhaps have avoided the
blame that now attaches to us.

The ultimate irony is that all this expense is being paid for by US
taxpayers.  Not just the costs of the bribes we pay to foreign
officials, or the extra costs attached to materials for which
government monopolies set prices, not just the costs of keeping covert
armies in the field (one chapter is titled 'How the American taxpayer
brought the Cuban civil war to Lake Tanganyika') -- but the fact that
US banks are giving money to Mobutu to waste as he sees fit, and when
Mobutu skips the country, and Zaire is forced to default, you and I
will bear the expense of compensating the banks for their lost
capital.  Didn't you ever wonder why so many banks seem to be so
heavily involved in loans to Third World governments?  Irresponsible
governments have a voracious appetite for money, and the banks can't
lose because their loans are guaranteed by the US government.

Kwitny's discussion of Zaire is the most interesting, primarily because
Kwitny lived in Zaire for some time and experienced some of the events
he describes at first hand.  But Kwitny also discusses other countries
in some detail, among them Nigeria (where the US decided not to
intervene in a civil war that really wasn't a result of 'communist
infiltration' and made friends), Afghanistan (where the Russians showed
how they completely misunderstood the situation, which is great for us,
since up to the time of the invasion WE were shooting those nomads,
through the Baluchi 'pacification' program of the Pakistani
government), and Guatemala (where US representatives in the field
praised moves toward democracy, but our government was listening to
United Brands instead).  Kwitny seems to agree with me that our next
foreign policy disaster on the order of Iran will be in the
Philippines, which he calls 'the Zaire of Asia'.  China, Iran, Grenada,
Cuba and Angola are also discussed.

This is a very interesting, well-written, well-researched book.  About
the only qualm I have is that Kwitny is a conspiracy fan; he sees
coverups and collusions everywhere.  After having seen the documented
conspiracies, it's easy to see how Kwitny might be led to conclude that
more of them exist.  I'm not convinced that our government and large
corporations are really clever enough or coordinated enough to pull off
most of these conspiracies; considering the ample evidence of our
bumbling, I think it's more likely that creatures like Mobutu are
taking advantage of us than the reverse.  (After all that effort to
kill Lumumba, guess how he died?  Mobutu and company put him on a plane
to Katanga province, where he had savagely suppressed a rebellion; he
was probably dead within minutes after being dumped on the runway,
certainly within days.)

Anyway, I recommend the book highly.

Donn Seeley    University of Utah CS Dept    donn@utah-cs.arpa
40 46' 6"N 111 50' 34"W    (801) 581-5668    decvax!utah-cs!donn