[net.religion] I can't reply to each of you individually

dyl (02/12/83)

I never had any intention to bring the subject of religion up on netnews.
I agree that it is a very poor medium.  There is no way to force religion
on anybody.  The only way to win souls is to be ready and patient when
people ask and not be arrogant and say that I am too busy.

No matter how hot the discussion gets, it is just a discussion and
nothing personel.  That is the American way.

If you noticed, I started responding to couple of news articles that I
judged irresponsible.  Since then, I received quite a bit of mail most
telling me not too politely various things.  The most ridicuous person
told me that it is a violation G.E.I. and misuse of company equipment and
threaten to take the matter up with my supervision.  If people are not
ashamed to idolize the Greatful Dead publically on the net,  I see no
reason for me to be ashamed to quote scripture.  But I am glad to say
that some of the responses I've gotten have been favourable.

I should admit that my article about "What would you rather believe" is
questionable.  I got quite tired of people telling me that Hindulism,
bla, bla, bla, are just as good.  Instead of replying each individually,
I tried to respond publically on the net.  I was brought up in Hong Kong
as was exposed to more eastern religions than I cared for.  All the things
mentioned are basic beliefs in eastern religions.  I tried to present
them in a satire manner and point out how ridiculous some of them are.

I have been a Christian for about 2 years and am relatively new.  I
found it trully shocking when I was first told on the net that the old
testament does not apply and that the new testament makes no sense to a
Jew.  My first response was that it is not possible.  Now I see that it is
possible because religions do grow and change with time.  The Roman
Catholic church for example has man-made rules, traditions, and rituals
brought in from other religions, none of which are mentioned in the
Bible but are judged essential.

What I like to do is to confront people back with the Bible when they
attack it and see if they can speak confidently about their belief.  I
also believe that if God is trying to reach us, he would make it as easy
as possible (most people disagree because they think anything simple is
not good).  I like to see people rely less on all kinds of writings that
make everything so complicated and fuzzy.  In other words, use a minimal
set and don't add to it everytime something disagrees.  I see no
reason for God to make himself a moving target.

Dave Lee

pss (02/12/83)

To Dave Lee:

	Even an enlightened person like yourself should not call other
people's religious beliefs "ridiculous."   There is an old expression
about a pot and a kettle...

				Paul Strauss, Brown Univ.
				...!{decvax, vax135, yale-comix}!brunix!pss
				pss.brown@udel-relay